Dismissed

M/s Hetero Drugs Limited v. The Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited

Telangana HC23 Dec 2021WP/22869/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

During interlocutory hearing, the petitioner admitted through counsel that the criminal appeal challenging the interim bail order had been disposed of by the lower court without hearing. Justice Radha Rani relied on this admission to quash the present Section 482 petition as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

The criminal petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. are dismissed as infructuous.

M/s Hetero Drugs Limited Vs The Telangana State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10970 OF 2013

¶7

Between:

¶8

Mrs. S.Sudha Rani, W/o. S.Gopal Reddy,

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

Mrs. R.Manga, W/o.R.Nagender

¶12

The State of A.P., rept. by its Public Prosecutor, High^{Court at H} yderabad RESPONDENTS

¶13

Petition under Section 482 ot Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances^stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the^{High Court may be pleased} to modify the Order passed by the learned lVletropolitan Sessions^{Judge, Cyberabad} at L.B.Nagar^passed in Crl.M.P.No.423 of 2013 in^{Crl.A.No.449 of 2013, dated} 30.07.2013 to the extent of directing the^petitioner to^{deposita sum of Rs.1,50,0001} while suspending the sentence of imprisonment made in C.C.No.406^{oI 2012, daled} 09.07.2013 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate Court^{No.lll,Kukatpally at} lvliyapur, Cyberabad.

¶14

CRLPMP. NO: 9861 OF 2013

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances^stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the^{HighCourt may be pleased} to stay the operation of the^{judgment passed} in^{C.C.No. 406 of 2012 dated} 09.07.2013 on the file of learned Metropolitan Magistrate Court^{No. lll, Kukatpally,} Cyberabad.

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the^Memorandumof Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of^{Sri KOWTURU} VINAYA KUMAR, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and of Sri G.L.Narasimha Rao, Advocate^{for the Respondent} No.1.

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

TH E HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI

¶19

I )RIMINAL PETITIOII No.1O97O of 2013

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

Le:rrne, courrst l appearing lor the pctitioners -.,ub:nittcd tl'iart ti;c crinrir-rtrl rpltcrl ut,s clisposcrl r.rl'ltclot.r' rltc Cor u.t l;t,lou rncl htirtr'. llrc t rusc ir tlrc crintirritl pctitioll ilocs rr )t :iLLr\i'r. lul. acijttclicirlion. as sLrr'lr tlle crintin.rl pctitiotr rnin. bc cLisirnlssed as in Iluct r-Lo r,ts.

¶22

Record ng the above snbrnission, the crimirral perition is dismissed as .nlructuous.

¶23

Miscell r.neous petitions pending, if any, shall s:and closed.

¶24

Sd/.K.SAILESHI ASSISTI\NT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII CJb SECTION OFFICER

¶25

To 1. The Metropolitr n Sessions Judge, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar 2. One CC to Sri Lowturu Vinaya Kumar, Advocate^(OPUC) 3. One CC to Sri^, ).L.Narasimha Rao, Advocate^(OPUC) 4. Two CCs to Pu )lic Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad (ouT) 5. Two CD Copie, 6. One Spare Co1 y Kj r {

HIGH COURT

DAIED:1311212021

ORDER

1u 5 tAls O
o' <?
--)
1$ l[tt?t]g
,\ 1-
.?ry
'- r
\ai__i-:--.

¶30

CRLP.No.10970 of 201 l

¶31

DISMISSING THE CRI, P. AS INFRUCTUOUS-

M/s Hetero Drugs Limited v. The Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Hetero Drugs Limited v. The Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Neelam Balamani Vs The State of Telangana

Duvvala Gandaiah alias Gundaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Bezawada Srinivasa Rao Vs Bezawada Janardhana Rao and 2 Others

Bandam Sarojana Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Jally Manjula Vs The State of Telangana

Haigreeva Dsp Infra Ventures Pvt. Ltd., Vs State of Telangana