High Court of Telangana considered a civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution. Petitioner's counsel withdrew the petition with liberty to seek remedies, leading to its dismissal as withdrawn.
Liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law granted; Criminal Revision Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ii
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTHDAYOF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTYONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICET.VINOD KUMAR
CIVIL REVIS ION PETITIo N NO: 1951 OF 2021
Petition under Arlicle227 of constitutionof lndia, aggrieved by the orderdated 10106121 in lA No.520/2021in lA No.5/21 in OS No.6/2021 0n the file of the court of the sub Divisional Magistrate& special Assistant Agent, Mobile court, Bhadrachalam.
<sup>l''I Between:
tBezawada Sri nivas'a Rao 5/o Late Narsaiah,agedabout 62years'Occ. Agriculture R/o PardhasaradhiPuramVillage' Penuballi Mandal, Khammam District. .. Petitioner/ Respondent/Defendant No'3 And \ ,y'.I 5/o Bezawada Late Narsaiah, Janardhanaaged72 Raoyears' Occ' Agriculture I Vo LingagudemVillage'Penuballi Mandal' Khammam District. .. Respondent/Petitioner/Plaintiff
\
/.OrugantiKrishna Rao ' S/o Arjun aged 37years,occ.Agriculture R/o, Uppala ChelakalaVillage'PenuballiMandal Khammam District.
5/o Pentaiah, aged35 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o. Uppala ChelakalaVillage, PenuballiMandal Khammam District.
( R 2 & 3 is not tt*::il#:HJn,v o,",ponaents/DerendantNo.1&2
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 of cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to suspend of operation of the order dated 10/06/202'1 passed in l.A, No.520 of 2021 in l.A. No. 5/2021 in o.S. No. 6/2021 on the file of the sub Divisional Magistrate and special Assistant Agenl, Mobile Court, Bhadrachalam.
For the Petitioner : SRI KONDAPARTHI SRINIVAS, Advocate
For the Respondents :
The Court made the following: ORDER
C
HO {OURABLE SRIJUSTICE T.VINOD KUVIAR C VIL RE VIS oN ON o.I 5lo f2 021
ORDER:
Learn ,d counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw this Civil Revision pe ition with libeny to avail remedies in accordance with la',v.
Granti.Lg liberty as sought, this Civil Revision petition IS dismissed as vithdrawn. No costs.
As a se quel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
ASSrsrAff/#3fli'-1H //TRUE COPYII To 1. SECTION OFFICER iiio..l:r?ffi' 'nalMasistrate and speciarAssistant Asent 2. Mobile Court, 4.3. One Spare iff33 tH:] bop y:ondaparth i S rinivas, Advocate (opuc ; n
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1611212021
ORDER
CRP.No.1951ot 20',1
DISD. AS WITHDR \WNTHECRP.
5
fj l)
/
Bezawada Sri nivas'a Rao
Janardhan Rao
Oruganti Krishna Rao
S/o Pentaiah
T.Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
