High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging acquisition of open plot property, as the petitioner filed a letter withdrawing the petition.
Petitioner's application to withdraw the writ petition was accepted; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION N o. 1874OF 2021
Between:
Smt. Neelam Balamani, W/o. N. Babaiah, Aged 56 years, Occ. House Wife R/o H. No. 1-47, Kothaguda Village, Serilingampally l\rlandal, RR District, Hyderabad - 500084
AND
...RESPONOENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondents in interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of property of the petitioners Open Plot of 1 1 1 .1 1 Sq Yards or 92.89 Square meters rn Survey No. 36, Bounded by North- Grave Yard (Survey No. 35), South Part of House. No. 2-14lG, East-Land of N. Ravinder, West- It4ain Road, Kothaguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District without following procedure as being arbitrary, illegal, violative of Articles 14, 21 & 300-,4 of The Constitution of lndia and contrary to The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, consequently, direct Respondents not to interfere with the above said property of the petitioners without paylng compensation as per prevailing market value by conducting award enquiry in pursuance of notification dated 2710212020 following procedure in accordance with law.
IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the
property of thepetitioners Open Plot of 111.11 Sq Yardsor 92 89 Square metersin Survey No.36, Boundedby North- Grave Yard (Survey No 35)' South Part of House. No. 2-141G,Easllandof NRavinder'West- Main Road' Kothaguda Village,serilingampallyMandal,RangaReddyDistrictwithoutfollowingprocedUre under the Rightto Fair Compensationand Transparency tn Land Acquisition, Rehabilitationand Resettlement Act, 2013'
Counsel forthe Petitioner:SRI D' DEVENDER RAO
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos' 1,2and 4: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel forthe Respondent No'3: Mr' SAMPATHPRABHAKARREDDY' SC FOR GHMC,
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICET.VINODKUMAR
WRIT PETITIONNo'1874 of 2021
ORDER
Learned counselfor thepetitionerexpressesdesire to withdraw the
writpetition.A|etterdated12.l2,2o2ltotheaboveeffecthasalready
been filed andplacedon record of the Court'
in view of the same,the writ petitionis dismissedas withdrawn'
Pending miscellaneouspetitions, if any, shallstand closedin the light of
this final order. No orderas to costs.
/iTRUE COPY//
SD/-B.SAWAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR &
SECTION OFFICER
To,
GJ
SW h'!
HIGH COURT
DATED:1611212021
ORDER
WP.No.1874 of 2021
$e S I.e
7
k (..(
o
0 7 JAtl20?2
Ss f,,.J a i r-9
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
{r' ;, \ @)
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Neelam Balamani
The State of Telangana
The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
The Assistant City Planner
The Special Deputy Collector
T. VINOD KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
