High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 as well as a miscellaneous petition under Section 151 CPC for default and non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE LA N GA NA ;;" ",i*,[i,iflJi{,:TE
THURSDAY, THE SIXTEEN rwo rH o usn ^ir1tBflf,I8i,ro.ilE tui B E R
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
Between:
WRIT PETITI ON NO :21771 oF2002
Colony, Sarangapur, :TtN SunithaAtias Nizamabadtndrani, W/o.Late Sudhakar Rao, R/o Q.No.E-8, NCSF AND ,.,PETITIONER
Nii:il:B3:.*operariveSugar Factory Limited., Rep. by its rVlanasinsDirector,
..RESPONDENT
Petition under Articre 226 of rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not regularizing the services of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the principles of natural justice with a consequential direction to regularize and extend all the benefits like pay scale etc as applicable to the permanent employees, to the petitioner"
WPMP. NO:27261 oF 2002
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to continue the petitioner is service pending the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S. SREERAMACHANDRA MURTHY
(NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for Respondent: SRI VEDULA SRINIVAS
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLESRIJUSTICEABHINANDKUMARS {I\VILI
2 WRITPETITIONNo.2177 l ol 2
ORDER:
Todoy thoughthe motter is listed under ll-e coption 'for dismissol',none oppeoredforlhepetitioner'
A perusol ofthe recorddiscloses thot there wos no represenlotionfor the petitioner on 09'09'2021 on<l therefore'the motterwosdirectedtobelistedtodoyunderilrecoption.for dismissol',Todoyolso,thereisnorepresentotionforthepetitioner though the molleris lisled under the coplion 'for clismissol'This Courl hos no other optionexcept to dismiss the cos('for defoult'
Accordingly. ihe writpetitionis dismissed for defoultond for non-prosecuiion. No costs.
Pending miscelloneouspelilions.if ony,sholl s ond closed.
SD/. N.CH ANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// q"
I
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to Sri S.Sreeramachandra lvlurthyrAdvocate [OP .JC] 2. One CC to Sri Vedula Srinivas Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies 4. One Spare Copy MBC
*-'-
HIGHCOURT
DATED:1610912021
r.E STAIE
( ^\t
,,1
f,oLr 0 7 tlti?0?l .r\o
*
i
ORDER
WP.N 0.21771 of 2002
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR
NON.PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS,
Yr*
ox<br>D
Syed Sundara Sundari nitha
Nizam Sugar Factory Limited
Abhinand Kumar'''Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
