The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition challenging a corrigendum issued by the Indian Oil Corporation as infructuous without costs after counsel submitted that the cause no longer survived for adjudication.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs awarded; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 477 0F 2018
Between:
Ravi Surya Engineering Associates, Plot No.266, SardalPatel Associates, Road No.23, Sardar P'atel N-agar, Hldernagar, RangaReddy District Hyderabad. Represented by its Proprietor K.K.R.Bhaskar
..pETtTtoNER
AND
...RES,ONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution oflndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiled therewith, the High Court may be pleasedto issue a writ order or direction moreparticularly, one in the natureof a writof certiorari calling for, the records relating to corrigendumNo.ll dated 22-12-2017 issued by the 3rd respondent stipulatingadditionaltenderconditionto the TenderNotification N umbers:
sRcc/PT/87/TAPSO/2017-1 8,
sRcc/PT/88/TAPSO/2017-1 8,
sRcc/PT/89/TAPSO/201 7-1 8,
sRCC/PT/9o/TAPSO/2017-1 8,
SRCC/PT/g1 /TAPSO/2017.1 8,
sRCC/PT/92ITAPSO/2017-1 8,
S RCC/PT/g3/TAPSO/201 7I8,
sRCC/PT/94/TAPSO/2017-18 and sRCC/PT/95/TAPSO/2017-18as illegal,arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14 and19(1)(g) of the constitution of lndia and to quash the same and consequently directthe respondents to considerthe bidssubmittedby thepetitioner for all the ninelocationswithoutrestricting the bids for onlytwo locations.
lA NO: 1 oF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High court may be pleased to directthe respondents to consider all the nine bids submitted bythe petitioner pursuant to the Tender Notification numbers:
j
SRoo/PT/87/TAPSO/2017-18, sRCC/PT/88/TAPSO/201 7-1 8, SRCC/PT/89/TAPSO/201 7.1 8, SRCC/PT/SO/TAPSO/201 7.1 8, sRcc/PT/g 1 /TAPSO/20'1 7-1 B, sRcc/PT/g2lTAPSO/201 7-1 8, SRCC/PT/g3/TAPSO/20 1 7.I8, SRCC/PT/94/TAPSO/201 7-1 B and SRCC/PT/g5/TAPSO/201 7-1 8.
IA NO: 2 OF 2018
Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the corrigendum no.2 issued by the respondent no.3 pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K. RAMESH BABU
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI PUTREVU PRABHAKAR
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
LION'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
\l'.P.No.177 Q!-2018
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication and hence, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ petition is
dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Nliscellaneous petirions, if any, pending shall stand
closed.
\
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. M. MANJULA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
--
SECTION OFFICER
To,
- One CC to Sri K. Ramesh Babu, Advocate IOPUC] 2. One CC to Sri Putrevu Prabhakar, Advocate [OPUC] 3, One CC to Sri Dominic Fernadaz, SC FOR IOCL [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies 5. One Spare Copy CHR 2 *--
. HIGH COURT
DATED:1510912021
ORDER
W.P.No.477 of 2018
1 t{e 5TA1€
(
tZ
n
r.tat
co 2$ 0[T?
*
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS,
Y,,, ,6', (6)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives for adjudication or has become infructuous.
Ravi Surya Engineering Associates
The Chairman, Indian Oil Corporation Limited
The Deputy General Manager, Contracts
The Tender Invitation Authority
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
