The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 15211 of 2006 for default and non-prosecution as the petitioners failed to appear despite being listed under appropriate captions over a period of time. No other option was available to the Court.
Writ petition dismissed for default and non-prosecution without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE I TE AT H YDESJfJE DOF (upeciat Original Jurisdiction)
TE LAN GAN A
THURSDAY, THE SIXTEEI\ rwcj ru 6 Jsn'-,-r'I[ B ?fi,I ffi.:S ilE M B E R
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
Betwee n:
WR|TpETtTtON NO: 15211 OF 2006
I I I i
2
*-
,)
Talab kattil, I{yclerabad.
... PI]TITIONI'RS
AND
CDNTRAL POWtrR DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OIT A.P.LTD., Red Hill, Hyderabad, Being represented by its Chief Genereil Manager (Comml) A.P.C.P.D.C.L.
...RI)SPONDENT.
WPMP. NO: 18937 OF 2006
Petition under Section'151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High courtmaybe pleaseddirectthe respondents to direct therespondentsto receivethe applicationsof the petitioners herein for thepost of JuniorLinemen.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI G.NARASIMHA NAIDU (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for Respondent: SMT.K. UDAYASRI
The Court made the following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMARSHAVILI
WRIT PETITI ON No.l52l 1 of 2006
ORDER:
Todoy ihough the motteris llsied underthe coption 'for <jism ssol', none oppeoredfor ihe peliiioners.
Aperusol of the record disclosesthoi therewos no ropresr:nlotron for thepetitioners on Aq.092021 ond therefore,lhe nrolrer wos direcled lo be lisied todoyunder lhe copt on 'for rilsnrrssr-rl'. Todoy olso, thereis no represenlotion for the pet tioners lhough ihe motter is listed underlhe coption 'for dismissol'. This Court l.ros no olher oplion exceptto dismisslhe cose for defouli.
Accordingly, the writpeiltion is dismissed for defouli ond for
n on. prosec ution. No costs.
Pending miscelloneouspetitions,if ony, sholl stond closed.
SD/.K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANTREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// C"
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1610912021
1dE S?A r€
(
r
.),) 18 ocl2CI2l z
})
t *
ORDER
WP.No.15211 of 2006
DISMISS!NG THE WRIT PETITION FOR
NON.PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS
qt
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of the petitioners on the listed date.
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the failure of the petitioners to appear after notice.
Mohd Khaleel and others
Central Power Distribution Company Ltd. A.P.
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
