The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition filed by a workman seeking mandamus against the Superintending and Executive Engineers for non-issuance of reinstatement orders. The court held the petition was infructuous and dismissed it without costs.
None. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous on merits without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 19559 OF 2002
Between:
Smt. J. Yellamma, W/o. Sammaiah Gang Mazdoor, R:/o.Atmakur, Warangal District
...PETrroNER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filedtherewith,the High court maybe pleased call for the records from the respondentand issue an appropriateWrit, orderor direction moreparticularly one in thenature of Writ of Mandamus declaringthe action of the respondents in not issuingthe reinstatementorders in compliance of the award dt.24.3.1999passed in1.D.No.127 of1995publishedon 7'8'1999vide G.O,.Rt.No.1257 dt.16.7.1999 0nthe file of the court of the Hon'ble lndustrial Tribunal-cum-Labour court,warangal as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, contrary to law disobedience and inviolative of Article 14 & 21 of the constitution of lndia and grant all consequential benefitsin the interestof justiceand faiplay
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI P. SRIDHARRAO
Counsel for Respondents: GPFOR ROADS& BUILDINGS
The Court made the following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SIAVITI
WRIT PETITION No.,l9559 of 2002
ORDER:
When the motter is token up for heoring, leorned counsel oppeoring for the petitioner hod contended thot the couse in the writ petition does not survive for odjudicolion ond hos become infructuous.
Recording the soid submission, the wril petition is dismissed os
infructuous. No costs.
Pending miscelloneous pelilions, if ony, sholl stond ctosed.
SD/.K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
\
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 One CC to Sri P S ridhar Rao Advocate IOPUCI 2 Two CCs to GP For Roads & Buildings, High Court for the State of Telangana tourl 3 Two CD Copies
4 One Spare Copy Ii4BC
HIGHCOURT
DATED:1610912021
-i +E I iA)
.
o. <br>a<
Yi
a),j r05 0CT2021
o,..
')/ -t
,r'-C
ORDER
WP.No.19559 of 2002
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS
INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS
t
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. J. Yellamma
The Superintending Engineer
The Executive Engineer
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
