Dismissed

M. Yadamma v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC2 Feb 2021WP/1930/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 1930 of 2021 as withdrawn by the petitioners with a liberty to file a fresh petition when required. The petition concerned the registration of sale deeds for land. The court accorded permission for withdrawal and dismissed the matter without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission was accorded to withdraw the writ petition along with liberty to file a fresh writ petition when required.

M. Yadamma Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH^GOUD

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 1930 OF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

l/. Yadamma, W/o late Chenna^{Reddy,aged about 66 years,}

¶9

tr/. Shekhar Reddy, S/o late Chenna^{Reddy,aged about 40 years,}

¶10

Voggu Laxmaiah, S/o late Mallaiah,^{agedabout 42} -years' a. Voggu Parvathalu, S/o late^{lVlallaiah,aged about40 years,} _ .. All are residents of Dhannaram Village,^{Kandukuru mandat, .. O,tl.rar,,ONERS}

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, represented^{by Principal Secretary'Revenue}

¶13

Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶14

Z. tfr6 Oistrictbollector, Ran{a^{Reddydistrict, Hyderabad.}

¶15

The then Joint Collector,^{Ranga Reddydistrict'}

¶16

The Revenue Divisional Officer,^{Kandukuru Division, Rangareddy district'}

¶17

The Joint Registrar cum^{Tahsildar, Kandukuru mandal, Rangareddy district'}

¶18

The District Registrar,^{R.R. district.}

¶19

TheSub-Regisfrar,Maheshwaram,Rangareddydistrict. ...RES'ONDENT.

¶20

Petition under Article 226 ol^{the constitution of lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith,the High court may be pleased to} pass an appropriate writ, order or direction more^{particularlyone in the nature of writ} of I/andamus, directing the^{respondent no.5,to registerthe sale deeds,in the event} of the^petitioners submitting^{applicationsfor registrations,and also book a slot for} registration, in view of the orders^{of this honble High Court in commonordersin} c.h..p. t1o.3095,3096/1989^{and WP. No.13565 and13566/1989 dated 30-4-1993} and also in view of the orders^{in w.A.No. 1230/1993, in respect of the land bearing} S.No. 320 totally admeasuring^{Ac.9-37 gts, which totally belongingto the petitioners,} in the interest of^justice.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner :^{M/s. G. RAMA CHANDER RAO} Counsel for the Respondents:^{GPFOR REVENUE} The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶22

¶23

TH E HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD

¶24

WRIT PETITION No.193O oF 202L

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writ petition as and when required.

¶27

Permission accorded.

¶28

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrarvn rvith a liberty to file fresh writ petition as and when required. No order as to costs.

¶29

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed.

¶30

SD/.M.MANJULA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (\ ,TRUE COPY// sEcroN bkficen

¶31

To,

¶32

One CC to M/s. G.^{RamaChanderRao, Advocate} IOPUCI

¶33

Two CCs to GP for Revenue,^{High Courtfor the State of Telangana} at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶34

Two CD Copies SM

\Ntr<\

HIGH COURT

DAf ED:0210212021

ORDER

WP.No.1930 of 2021

6e sIAr!
ox.-
/J-
o:)o ,ll tEB 2021
4
{ Otc

¶41

DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN,

¶42

WITHOUT COSTS

¶43

\0 "s,

M. Yadamma v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M. Yadamma v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudi Reddy Srinivas Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

P. Ashok Goud and 10 Others Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others

Avvaru Sanjay Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

M/s. Z.R Group Vs State of Telangana and 4 others

Nagoju Suresh Vs the State of Telangana

Smt Rekha Sharma Vs State of Telangana