Petitioners sought writ relief for illegal non-registration of land plots. The High Court granted permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one and dismissed the matter as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUONDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITION NO: 1399 OF 2021
Between:
AND
Petition under Article 226 ofthe constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiledtherewith, the HighCourt may be pleased to pass an order or direction or writ,in the nature of Mandamusduly declaring ti-re action of therespondent 4 and 5 in not entertainingthe registrations in survey number155 and 156 of Gopanapalli,serlingampalli Ir/Jndal, Ranga Reddy Districtas illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of naturaljustice as well asagainst rights conferred underArticle 300 (A) of Constituiion of lndia, andconsequently, direct the Sth respondentto register the individualplots in thelay out belongs to the '1st and 2nd petitionersherein out of an extent of Acers9-11 guntas, in survey numbers 156a (part) and 156aa(part) at Gopanapalli,Serlingampalli Mandal, Ranga Reddy Districtto the otherpetitioners hereinin the interest of justice.
IA NO: 1 0F 2021
Petition under Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed insupport of the petition,the Highcourt may be pleasedto direct the 5th respondentto register the individual plots in the lay out belongs to the 1st and 2ndpetitioners hereinout of an extentof Acers 9-11guntas, in .rr*y nrrUers l d6a(part) and 156aa(part) at Gopanapalli,Serlingampalli fr,l"nOlf, RangaReddy Districtto the other petitionersherein in the interestof justice.
'Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P. RAMA SHARANA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE The Court madethe following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITION No.1399 OF 2O2L
ORDER:
1 . When the matter is taken up for he aring, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition. Permission accorded,
SD/-V.SUDHA ASSISTANT REGIS'RAR //TRUE COPY// ?N -/ SECTION OFFICER
To '1. On" CC to Sri P. Rama Sharana Sharma, Advocate tOqqCJ
h^^r-
HIGH COURT
DATED:0110212021
ORDER
WP.No.1399 of 2021
fl S TA 14:
, 05 rEB 2021
*
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS
SN. 5_coq>'uD )r-o{o' ["'l
2 provisions across 2 enactments
P. Ashok Goud and ors.
The State of Telangana and ors.
T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
