Dismissed
K.Palalochana Rao v. Praga Tools Limited., Rep by Md., and Another
Telangana HCWP/18049/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE ST rtr"",,i $"IE,"oi l:l#ffii Ar…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE ST rtr"",,i $"IE,"oi l:l#ffii Ar…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE ST rtr"",,i $"IE,"oi l:l#ffiiAr HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE^EIEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST rwo rHousAND AND ,wEn,ri oilE-
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
Between:
W IT PETI NO: I 49 oF2 0
Enro,.l?,lil#1fl,[""?3u;3': SJt"]ra Reddv, aged 43 vears, r No 2B02, EWs H e2e
AND
...PETITIONER
.,.RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndja praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be preased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of [,4andamus declaring that the impugned order No.1 1ior1Rr2i,o2r2oos dt 30-7-200s of the Second respondent as ilegar and arbrtrary and consequenfly to set a side the same, direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner with all consequential benefits.
WPMP. NO: 2297I OF 2005
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased suspend the impugned order No. 1 1 1 0 lHRl2B02l2005, dated 30-7-200S,
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. B.c. RAVINDER REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: SMT G. SUDHA
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HON'BtESRIJUSTICEABHINANDKUMARSHAVITI
WRITPETITIONNo']8049of 2005
ORDER:
Whenthemolteristokenupforheoring,leornedStonding Counseioppeoring for lhe respondents hod contendedlhol the couse inthe writ peliliondoes not survive for odiudicotionond hos beconrelnf ru ctuous
Recordingthe soid submission,the writ petitionis dismissed os
infructuous,No cosis
Pending miscelloneouspetiiions, if ony, sholl slond closed'
1
SD/-I.NAGALAKSHMI
ASSISTANT R GIST
I
//TRUE COPY// I SECTION FFICER
To, 1 . One CC to Sri B.G. Ravinder Reddy,Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Smt G. Sudha, Advocate [OPUC] J. Two CD Copies 4. One Spare Copy CHR
*--.-
HIGH COURT
DATED:1110812021
,\ e TA 'r (r
o,.
o:) z
17 sEPt$tl
.i-))
Ic
t .J
* o .4
ORDER
W.P.No.18049 of 2005
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS,
w
@
Sri. V. N. Sruja Reddy
Praga Tools Limited
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court