This order dismisses a writ petition challenging an impugned circular regarding faculty recruitment as the subject matter has become in-fructuous.
The writ petition was dismissed as in-fructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
Between:
WRIT PETITION NO: 14766 OF 2015
!l:!lt!l 9oll"s9 .of. Engineering& .Technotogy, sponsoredby Nathaniet troucarronat s_ociety, Lamoore village, Kandukur lv]andai, Ranoa Rebdv District. rerang_ana S tate, Rep.by its Secretary,C.Vinay Kumar, S/o.BhommSiah,aged about 55 years
AND
...PETITIONER
...RESPoNDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the impugned circular dated 27.3.201 5 fixing various conditions and the time schedule for recruitment of faculty members in engineeflng college which amounts to interference in the administration of the petitioner institution as arbitrary,illegal, and without any authority of law and set aside the same in so far as petitioner is concerned
WPMP. NO: 19217 oF 2015
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned gircular dated 27.3.201 5 issued by 2nd respondent tn so far as petitioner is concerned
Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. K. V. RAJASREE
Counsel for Respondent No. 1: GP FOR HIcHER EDUCATION
Counsel for Respondent No. 2: SRI V. RAMCHANDER GOUD
Counsel for Respondent No. 3: SRI K. RAMAKANTH REDDy
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
W.P.No.l4766 of 2015
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that the subj ect matter in the Writ Petition has become inlructr-rous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
inffuctuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/.N,CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
\
SECTION OFFICER
To,
Two CD Copies IVBC
\ J--
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0910212021
rr s ii"
q
o() 2E FEfi i$21 ta
*
:ia
ORDER
WP.No.14766 of2015
DISMISSING THEWRIT PETITION AS
INFRUCTUOUS,WITHOUT COSTS
1r:\ L' >\
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition maintains any cause of action as it has become in-fructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Association of Engineering and Technology, sponsored by Mathematics Society, Lambore village, Kandukur Mandal, Rao Nagar District, Telangana State
State of Telangana, rep. by its principal Secretary, Higher Education Department
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad, rep. by its Registrar
All India Council for Technical Education, rep. by its Member Secretary
Abhind Kumar Shavili
Sri Neelam Chandra Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
