Petitioner challenged construction of public toilets near their residences under writ petition. Court found meritless and dismissed as infructuous.
Petition dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO:139 OF 2014
Between:
AND
.RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of lvlandamus declaring the action of the respondent no. 2 proceeding to construct public toilets on 100" feet road leading to Suryapet of Thirumalagiri Village and [Vandal, Nalgonda District more particularly nearby or infront of the petitioners houses without considering the petitioners and their family members and other residents health and sanitary condrtions as illegal, arbitrary, high handed, and against the Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia
WPMP. NO: 152 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pending disposal of the above Writ Petition this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.2 not to construct the public toilets facility at 100" feet road leading to Suryapet of Thirumalagiri Village and I/andal, Nalgonda District more particularly infront of the or nearby the petitioners residences
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI D. V. CHALAPATHI RAO
Counsel for Respondent No. 1: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: SRI G. NARENDER REDDY, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION No.139 of 20]4
ORDER:
Leorned counsel oppeoring for the petitioners submits thot
ihe couse in the writ petition does nol survive for odjudicotion ond
hos become infrucluous.
Recording the soid submission, the writ petition is dismissed os
infructuous. No order os to costs.
Pending miscelloneous petitions, if ony, sholl slond closed.
SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
\
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to Sri D V Chalapathi Rao Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP For Panchayat Raj & Rural Development, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]
I\1BC
tD$'
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0910212021
(
1 !.i 'e s TA
b
o
t) 2 6 t E B 2021
* 'c
*
-c'A
ORDER
WP.No.139 of 2014
,|
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS
INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS
. \2-<br>xS "'\L"Jv
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sura Sura Parashuram and others
District Panchayat Officer, Nalgonda
Grampanchayath Thirumalagiri
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
