S. Narasimha Reddy v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its

Telangana HC8 Feb 2021WP/24639/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner moved a writ petition under Article 226 regarding building permission approval. Upon hearing, it was submitted that the grievance was resolved via interim orders dated 07.11.2008, leading the court to close the petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was closed with no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions were also closed.

S. Narasimha Reddy Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its — Telangana HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Originat Jurisdiction)

¶2

N/ONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

¶5

wRlT PET|T|ON NO. 24639 0F 2008

¶6

Between:

¶7

S. Narasimha Reddy, S/o. Ramireddy Agriculture R/o. Gowdavalli Village, IMedchal lt/andal' Ranga Reddy District

¶8

...pETrrroNER

¶9

AND

¶10

The Government of Andhra Pradesh,^{rep. by its, District PanchayatOfficer'} Ranga Reddy District.

¶11

The^"Gowdavalli Gram^{Panchayat, GowdavalliVillage,l,4edchalMandal, Ranga} Reddv District reD. bv the Panchavat Secretary. S rtre daipanch,^{Gowdavalli Villase, tvedchaltr/landal,*,"n' *::;|[Sit$iib=*r,}

¶12

Petition under^{Article 226 of the constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavit filed therewith,the High court may be pleased} toissueawritofMandamusoranyotherappropriatewritordirectiondeclaringthe orderofthelstrespondentissuedinlVlemoNo'2813/2008-81(Pts)dated16'10.2008 in so far directing^{the 2nd respondentto approve the building permissionas per} G.O.lr/s.No.67^{(PR&RD) daled 26'022002 and the consequentialorder of the 2''d} respondentissuedinNo'GPG/3/200Bdated2l.lo.2o0Basillegalandarbitraryand consequently^{direct the 2ndrespondentto accord approval'}

¶13

WPMP. NO:32161^OF-2008

¶14

WPMP. NO:32161^OF-2008 petition under secr=ion 151 Cpc^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit^{fired in support of the petition, the High courtmay be pleased to direct} therespondentsnottointerferewiththeconstructionofthebuildingbearingHouse No.1_50 admeasuring^{an extentof 72 Sq. yars in sy.No.334 situatedat Gowdavalli} Village, tVledchal^{rvlandar, Ranga Reddy District, pendingdisposal of the writ petition'}

¶15

Counsel^{for the Petitioner:SRIO' MANOHER REDDY}

¶16

Counsel^{for the RespondentNo'1: GPFOR PAN-CHAYATRAJ AND} RURAL^DEVELOPMENT

¶17

counsel^{for the Respondent Nos'2 & 3: SRI} 3J?38-"'"tJ#r?9J;

¶18

The Court^{made the following:ORDER}

¶19

THE HON'BLE^{SRT JUSTICE ABIIINAND KUMAR SHAVILI} WRIT PETITI^{ONNo.2 4639of 2008}

¶20

ORDEB:

¶21

When the^{matter is takenup for hearing'counsel appearingfor} the petitioner^{has infomed the Court that the grievance of the} petitioner has been^{resolvedwiththe issuanceof interimordersdated} 07.1 1.2008 and in view^{of the same, no furlher orders need be passed} and the writ^{petitionmay be closed.}

¶22

In view of the above submissions,^{this Court is of the} considered view that the cause in the^{writ petition does not survive for} adjudicationwiththe issuance of interim orders dated 07.11.2008.

¶23

Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs.

¶24

Pending miscellaneous petitions, ifany, shall stand closed.

¶25

SD/'K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT BEGIgTRAR //TRUE COPY// sr-," SEGTION OFFICER

¶26

To'1. One CC to Sri O. Manoher Reddv, Advocate [OPUC]

¶27

Two CCs to GP for Panchayat^{Ftaj and Rural Development,High Court for the} State ofTelangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶28

One CC to Srib. Narender^{Reddy,-S.C.For GPP/N/PP/ZPP(OPUC)} 4. Two CD Copies.

N/P

HIGH COURT

DATED:0810212021

ORDER

WP.No.24639 of 2008

.t
H I s 16'
tt
d z4 FEB 2021 c',
!)

¶35

CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶36

w)/

S. Narasimha Reddy v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Narasimha Reddy v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sira Somaiah Vs Sri N. Sridhar and 3 Others

Md. Rajmahammad Vs Sri N. Sridhar

Marri Gattaiah Vs Sri N. Sridhar and 3 others

Vif Education Society Vs Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (Jntu)

Shri Magapati Muralidhar Vs Union of India

Apollo Finvest (India) Limited Vs State of Telangana