Disposed

Telangana State Level Police Recruitment Board, v. D Upender Reddy

Telangana HC18 Nov 2021WA/37/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A two-judge bench disposed of a Writ Appeal No. 37 of 2019 filed by the Telangana State Level Police Recruitment Board against an interim order. The court granted liberty to argue the underlying Writ Petition and directed its listing for disposal.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Appeal stands disposed without costs; the impugned interim order allowing liberty to argue the main Writ Petition stands affirmed implicitly.

Telangana State Level Police Recruitment Board, Vs… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA , AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A, RAJASHEKER REDDY

¶7

WRIT APPEAL NO: 37 oF 2019

¶8

writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters patent preferred against the order dated 27-12-2018 in LA.Nos.1, 2 and 3 of 2018 in wP No.4'1901 of 2o1B on the file of the High Court.

¶9

¶10

Betwecn:

¶11

The Telangana State Level Police^{Recruitment Board, O/o the} Director General of Police,^{TelanganaState,Saifabad,}

¶12

Hyderabad, Represented^{by its Chairman}

¶13

Appellant/ Respondent No.2iR2

¶14

AND

¶15

I D Upender Reddy^{S/o D Pooma Reddy,age:27 years,}

¶16

occu: Unemployed,^{rloH.No.1-93,Village:}

¶17

Shivanenigudem, Mandal^{Chityala, Dist. Nalgonda'}

¶18

2 Harikrishna T S/o^{Veeranna T, age: 29 years, occu:} unemployment, H.No.4-46^{Hanwada(Mandaland}

¶19

Village), Mahabubnagar.

¶20

3 Sarikondabobbili^{Sravankanth S/o Sarikondabobbili} Laxmikanth, age'.^{Z7 years,occu: Unemployee,r/o} H.No.1t-13-138,^{Road No.l, Margadarshicolony,}

¶21

Kothapet, Saroor^{Nagar, RR District.}

¶22

4 M.Uday Kumar^{S/o M.Rama Rao, age: 26 years,oQC\i} .,-' Unemployee, H.No.l-6-9,^{JubleePura, Khammam -}

¶23

Telangana.

¶24

5 Pallapu Sandeep^{S/o Anjaiah,age" 2lyears,occu"} _,,..' Unemployee,^{r/o H.No.1 3 -6 -25| I 5 I 1 66, TelecomColony'}

¶25

Jaffarguda,^{Karwan, Hyderabad-500006'}

/,/ /

6 Md.Attiqullah S/o Md.Nazar Hussain, age: 22 years, occu: Unemployee r/o T2-74, Near Shopping Complex, 8 Incline colony, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District.

¶30

7 K.Karthik Naik S/o K.Valya age: 29 years, occu: Unemployee, rlo H.No.4-100, Devabanda Thanda, Malkimiyanpally (v), Ghanpur mandal, Mahaboobnagar District.

¶31

8 Kothagatla Sai Srikar S/o Kothagarla Srinivas, age: 23 years, occu: Unemployee r/o Ch-09, Old colony, near DSP Office, Yellandu, Kothagudem, Bhadradri District.

¶32

9 Rafee Shaik S/o Hussain, age: 30 years, occul Unemployee. r/o H.No.4-107, Ramalayam street, Village: T.B.Palem, Mandal Kodad, Dist. Suryapet, Telangana508206.

¶33

10 Bikshapathi Gorantala, age: 33 years, occu: ExServiceman, rlo 4-6, Shayampet, Parkal, Warangal Rural -^{5063r 9.}

¶34

11 G Vinod S/o Ramulu, age: 28 years, occu: Unemployee r/o H.No.1-54154, Old Hafeezpet, Miyapur, RR District _ 500049.

¶35

12 Veeragoni Srinivas S/o Satyanarayana, age: 25 years, occu: Unemployee, r/o H.No.5-44, Samudrala, Ghanpur^z mandal, Jangaon dist.506252.

¶36

13 Yara Santhosh S/o Somaiah, age: 29 years, occu: Unemployee, r/o 1-80 Street No.1, Opp: Saibaba Temple lane, Kakatiya Nagar, Hubsiguda, Medchel-500007.

¶37

14 Jallika Murali S/o Lingaiah, age:27 years, occu: Unemployee, H.No.l-29, Haripirala (v), Thomrr Mandal, Mahabubabad District - 506163.

¶38

15.Vallap-u Krishna, S/o ChakrapSni, age- 2g years, occu_ Unemployee, r/o Plot No.298 and 299, Roap 20, S Rao N?gar, D_ammaiguOa, Ranga fiedd y 500083. PETITIONERS

¶39

16 rhe state or retansana,, Represenred dt [.ttJrlrt'ptT:Z:FJ,Xliif 3overnment, Home Department, Telangana SecretariSt, Hyderabad SOO O22'

¶40

.RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.1 lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶41

Petition under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the common order dated 27-12-18 passed in I A Nos.'l , 2 and 3 of 2018 in Writ Petition No.41901 of 2018 pending disposal of the Writ Appeal

¶42

Counsel for the Appellant: SRI M. V. RAMA RAO, SC FOR TSLPRB

¶43

Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 15: SRI RAMESH CHILLA

¶44

Counsel for Respondent No. 16: GP FOR HOME

¶45

The Cou( delivered the following: JUDGMENT

¶46

THE HON'BLI'^{THE CHIEF JUSTICESATISHCHANDRASHARMA} AND THE }TO N'BLE^{SRI JUSTICE A.RAJ ASHEKERREDDY}

¶47

Writ APPeal^{No.37 of 2O19}

¶48

JUdqment:^{lPertheLIon'bLethe ChiefJustice Satish ChandruSharr4ct)}

¶49

The present^{writ appeal is arising out ol an interim} order dated^{27.12.2018passed by the learned Single} Judge in^{I.A.Nos' 1,2 and 3 of 2018 in W'P'No'41901of} 2018.

¶50

When the^{matter is taken up, learned counsel for} the parties^{have fairly stated before this Court that a} liberty be^{granted to arguethe writ petitiontaking a1l} possible grounds^{and the learned Singte Judge be} requested to decide^{the writ petition at an early date'}

¶51

In the light of the^{request made by learned counsel} for the parties,^{the present writ appealstandsdisposed} ol.

¶52

Oflice is directed^{to iist W.P.No.41901 of 2018} before the learned^{Single Judge on 28.72'2021'and a} request is made to the^{learned Single Judge to decide the} writ petitic,n at an eariY^date.

¶53

¶54

The miscelianeous applications pending in this writ

¶55

appea-l, if arry, shall stand closed. There shall be no

¶56

order as to costs.

¶57

SD/.C.V.MALLIKARJUNA VARMA / DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY/I Lv-

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Chairman, Telangana State Level Police Recruitment Board, O/o. the Director General of Police, Telangana State, Saifabad, Hyderbad.

¶62

The rincipal Secretary to Government, Home Department, State of Telangana Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad 500 022

¶63

3 One CC to Sri M V Rama Rao Advocate [OPUC] 4 One CC to Sri Ramesh Chilla Advocate [OPUC]

¶64

Two CCs to GP For Home, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

¶65

b The Section Officer, Writ (Service) Section, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad. 7 The Section Officer, Posting Section, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶66

8I Two One CD Spare copyCopies

One Spare copyCopies

IVBC plp k\,

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1811112021

1 e S TA r€ \i
of,
(.) g a DEC202| !
,t

D
FSr)]: TC

¶72

JUDGMENT

¶73

WA.No.37 of 2019

¶74

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEAL

¶75

WITHOUT COSTS

¶76

Telangana State Level Police Recruitment Board, v. D Upender Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Telangana State Level Police Recruitment Board, v. D Upender Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Boddu Narsimhulu and 3 Others Vs The State of Telangana and 4 Others

Syed Sadiq Vs Rajiv Vidya Mission (Ssa)

M/s.Hyderabad Precision Mgf.Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Union of India

Bhagavathula Vamsi Krishnamacharyulu Vs State of Telangana

M/s.Safeway Infra, And 2 Others Vs Sri.MohanBeela, And 51 Others

M/s Ashok Enclave-Ii Owners Welfare Society Vs Smt. Sama Lakshmamma