This judgment dismisses a writ appeal and IA as infructuous because the respondent No. 4 no longer exists. No costs were awarded.
Disposed of all proceedings as infructuous with liberty to file fresh appeal if need arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH (,or*r r?f
I?5..JfJxoo,TELANGANA
rH uRs DA Y' rH: 5i^if.iilli ?AL?I |ffyEMB
E R
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTIC.E SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA THE HoN,BLE sRI JUST#DA. RAJASHEKER REDDY
|.A.NO.1 0F 2019 IN/AND wRlr eppeAlfd: r+e op zorg
wA NO.148 0F 2019:
writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters patent preferred against the order dated 29'08.2018 in l.A.No.1 of 2018 in w.p.No. 30509 of 2018 on the file of the High court.
Between:
Bhagavathula Vamsi Krishnamacharyulu, s/o Seetharamanujacharyulu, aged lbout35_years,H.No 2-23,NampalllT village, -VemulawaOa V'anOitdm,-biricitta Rajanna District, State of Telangana.-
...APPELLANT
AND
...RE.'.NDENTS
lA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 5 of Limitation Actpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay be pleased to condone the delay of 145 days in filing thispresent appeal
lA NO: 2 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto set aside the order in LA.No:1/2018 in W.P.No30509/2018, dated 29.8.2018by granting interim suspension of the order of the 3rd respondent-Executiveofficer, and pass Counsel for the Appellant: SRI G. U.R. C. PRASAD
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: GPFOR ENDOWMENTS
Counsel for Respondent No. 3: SRI K. JAGANMOHANREDDY, SC FOR ENDOWMENTS
Counsel for Respondent No. 4: -"
The Court delivered the following:COMMON JUDGMENT
I
/
AND
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE REDDY
I.A.No.1 of 20L9In/And W.A.No.14 8 of2019
COMMON JUDGMENT| 1c..trc no,'lr"rhe chiel&sn'esorrshcha'd1 tlnrin)
Sri G.U,R.C,Prasad,Iearned counselfor the appellant,is fair enough in inlbrmingthis court that the 4m respondent is no more' He therelore prays that thepresentwritappeal and I.A.No.1 of 2019 be disposed of asinfructuouswith a liberty to the appellant to file a fresh writ appeal, in case need arisesin future.
The writ appeal as also LA.No. 1 of 2Ol9 are accordingly
disposed of as infructuous with ttre aforesaid liberty.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed.
SD/.C.V.MALLIKARJUNA VARMA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// G,
SECTION OFFICER
To
- One CC to Sri G U R C Prasad Advocate [OPUC]
2,a 9ne Two 99 CCstg Sri to GP For Endowments, High CourtKasaJagan [/ohan Reddy, SC for forEndowments (OPUC) the State of Tetangana. [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies 5. One Spare Copy MBC
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1811112021
1 H L s T4
Y
3 0 z Drc202t
.o
.i)
I
4..
COMMON JUDGMENT
t.A.NO.1 0F 2019 IN/AND WRIT APPEAL NO: 148 OF 2019
DISPOSING OF THE WA & I.A.NO.1 OF 2019
AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS
Y
d
Bhagavathula Vamsi Krishnamacharyulu
State of Telangana
Commissioner of Endowments
Sri Raja Rajeswara Swamy Devasthanam
Sri Rachakonda Venkatacharya
Sri Justice C.V. Mallikarjuna Varma
Sri Justice Rajasheker Reddy
The Hon'ble Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
