The High Court of Andhra Pradesh/Writ Appeal dismissed the writ for want of prosecution after the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he had no instructions to appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Z-
H,GH COURI FOR rHI oF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD t/vEDNEsDAy, ,r,"'o" *o," o iSXfi | ll,.#lf,,pn["5^i., vE MB E R
PRESENT
IHE H.N,URABLE TH E HONOU R^". THE c JT*T,{:":.J:::,:#,[.J-,^
W IT AP P L i1 34 F2018
| dated | WritAppeal underCl 15.12.20,,,,,,*jlll#J;H"ff:;:::fi: |
Hrheorder passed |
|---|---|---|
| Between | ||
| ';1{f;#,[,qtff [ri::l:lr]:iu |
||
| 2P.I?S1.,Ramutu S/opashramutu,aged .r^b-?r]34 years.Occ:tvlandat tevetn.lorn_ lant,cumCterk,R/oHNo.3_taR31po1u-yi,,uo" uoutathabadIVIandat,MedakDislj.i--'',"s., |
,I | |
| s | And 3.GSrisalamS/oI,4atta,ah.agedabout41 L..-1,S.9tVa"dattevetAicountanrcu, 9]"rk. L/oHNo2-1 76/1coltakeriSada srvpetMandal,l,4edakDislrict 1RajjvVjdyaMissron(SSA)Srateprcject 9.n]:1tS'rl"of Tetanganalformerty'State 0rAndhrapradesh).SCERTpremiies, SlEl\ilAT Buitdrng, B.Btock,OppLatBaha lYl.Y,l9ly..Basheerbagh,Hyderabadrep oyrlsprojectDrrector/Secretary |
Appellants/ Petitioners '1to3 |
| t | 2.The.StateofTetangana(formerty State of Anonrapradesh)rep. byits principalSe- cretary,Primary Education &SSADepart_ ment,Secretariat,Hyderabad. |
|
| 3. TheSecretary, TelangnaResidentialEdu_ cational lnstitutionssociety(TREIS)(for_ merlyAndhrapradeshResidentialEduca_ tionattnstitutions Society (ApREtS). Hyderabad. |
||
| $ I I |
4.The Project Officer,RajivVidyal,itission (SSA),lvedakDistrjct,Telangana(for merlyAndhrapradesh ) |
|
| I I |
5. The SpeciatOfficer,KGB Vidyatayam l/edakDistrict,Telangana (formerly AndhraPradesh ) |
Respondents/ Respondents |
II
I I
.-_a--
<--').-- r-
/
I l
(R6 being forma pafiy not necessary to this Writ Appea )
Respondent/ P4 in WP
IAN oF 2018
Petition under section 15i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioners in servrce as Accountants in their respective KGBVs pending disposal of the Writ Appeal.
lA NO: 2 OF 2018,
petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to receive the Additionar Affidavit as arso Additionar Materiar papers and treat them as part of the Writ Appeal for proper adjudication of the Writ Appeat. Counsel for the Appellants: SRl. M. SRIKANTH
Counsel for the Respondents No 1 and 4: SRI G. BHASKAR
counsel for the Respondents No 2: Gp FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
Counsel for the Respondents No 3 and 5: SRI N BHUPAL REDDy
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
fl
RMA
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUS TICD A. RAJ
DY
WRIT APPEAL No.1 34 of 2O1a
JUDGMENT: tet the uotlble the chrelJusrice sar6h c handra sharmr.l
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he has no instructions in the matter.
In the light of the above submission, the writappeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any,shall stand closed.There
shall be no order as to costs.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/.C.V.MALLIKARJUNAVARMA DEPUTYREGISTRAR \Y.''
\
SECTIONOFFICER
'o'"'. on"CC to Sri M. Srikanth,Advocate.[OPUC] 3 EIE EE li3ji3,F[ffi:?'+3:i:1'3*%i"-i91'Er the state or re,angana at ; i;; ddJi"ep ioiSciroot Edu6ationHighcou Hvderabad(OUT)
CHR
HIGH COURT
DATED:17111t2021
JUDGMENT
s IA rdi
(
+
O 01DECzC?l
W.A.No.134 of 2018
DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL! b'1E .fg.I ryoN_PRosEcufloN WITHOUT COSTS
q
t<br>
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Z. Mohammad Ziya Uddin Khan S/O Pasashramudu
The State of Telangana
The Secretary, Telangana Residential Educational Institutions Society (TREIS)
The Project Officer, Rajiv Vidya Mission (SSA), Medak District
The Special Officer, KGB Vidyatram, Medak District
A. Raj
Sarabjeet Saran Chandrasekhara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
