Disposed

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., v. P.Venkaatamma and 2 Others

Telangana HC17 Aug 2021MACMA/802/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed appellant Bajaj Allianz to withdraw Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal pending before it after the matter was settled through Lok Adalat and the appellant offered to deposit the decreed compensatory amount.

What did the court decide?

Appellant permitted to withdraw the appeal; Insurance Company to deposit remaining decreed amount with accrued interest within 30 days.

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs P.Venkaatamma and 2 Others — Telangana HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

IN THE^{HIGH COURT FORDTHE€TATEOF TELANGANA}

¶3

TUESDAY,^{THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST} '"-- TWo inousnNo AND TwENTY oNE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR}

¶6

M.A,C,M.A.^{NO: 802oF 2015}

¶7

Appeal under^{Section173 M V Act' againstthe judgment/decreein OP} No.238/2012^{(old OP No.626of 2010) dated811212014on the file of the Court of the} Ir,4otorAccidentsClaimsTribunal-cum-lXAdditionalDistrictJudge,Wanaparthy, lvlahabubnagar.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Baiai Allianz General^{lnsurance CompanyL!d: R.ep.by its Deputylvlanager' H No 3-9'} ;F'?il;t"'5;;;'R;;; i";;ts.^{opp' Kalanik6tan' HanmanNasar' Dilsuknasar'} Hvderabad-So0 060'

¶10

...pETtfloNER/AppELLANT

¶11

AND

¶12

1 .^{p.Venkaatamma,w/o. Hanmanthu occ:Govt Employee as cook R/0.1 1-1 51,} Nagarkurnool Viliage and^{Mandal, Mahabubnagar District'}

¶13

z. kuiiJrikriihnareni, D/o. Hanmanthu,^{occ:HouseholdFl/o. 11-151, Nagarkurnool} Village and Ir/andal, [t/ahabubnagar District.

¶14

K.Kalhanna, S/o. Swamyu, H.No.^{1-81, NearGovt School, Laknaram Village of} Telkapally Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶16

MACMAMP. NO: 2173 OF 2015

¶17

Petition under Section 151 of CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed, the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including execution of order and decree dl.8-12-2014 in OP No. 238 of 2012 in the Court of the lvlotor Accrdents Claims Tribunal-Cum-lX Additional District Judge, Wanaparthy, Mahabubnagar District pending the above appeal and be pleased to pass

¶18

For the Appellant : M/s MADHAVI PRIYA MANTENA, Advocate

¶19

For the Respondents : NONE APPEARED

¶20

The Court delivered the following: JUDGl\ilENT

¶21

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR

¶22

MACMA No.8O2 of 2Ol 5

¶23

JUDGMENT:

¶24

it is represented by the learned counsel for the appellant that during the pendency of the Motor Accident Civil Miscelianeous Appeal before this Court, the matter was referred to Lok Adalat. Upon such reference, the matter has been settled before the Lok Adalat and an Award has also been passed by the Lok Adalat to that effect.

¶25

ln tht:Iigl-rt of the aforesaid submission, this^{NIACMA is closed} i: tcnrs ol Ar'. r|ti .ialtccl 20,02.202^{1 passed b1' the Lol':Aclalat}

¶26

Miscellaneous^petltions, if any^{pending,shall standclosed,}

¶27

Sd/.K,VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY//

¶28

¶29

SE TION O FICER 1. The Chairman lvlc)tor Accidents Claims Tribunal -lX Addi.tional D Judge, Wanaparthy. Mahabubnagar District. One CC to M/s A/adhavi Priya Mantena, Advocate (OpUC) 3. Two CD Copies 4. One Spare Copy Kj

HIGH COURT

DATED:^1710812021

JUDGMENT

MACMA.No'802^{of 2015}

¶34

j .<br>to+
'q\rt<br>a--) 1 I 20?1 a!,Zl
L)La.
.ss#zun)

¶35

CLOSING^{THF- MACMA.}

H
)

BEFORE THE LOK ADATAT

¶41

HETD AT IIYDER,ABAD

¶42

[Orgonized by High Court Legol Services bommlttee HIgh Courl for the Slole o, Ieldngono (Through Video Conference mode)

¶43

Under Seclion i 9 of lhe Legol Services Aulhorilies Act, .t,87 (Centrol Acr)l MACMA No. 802 of 2Ol5

¶44

(Before the Hon'ble High Court)

¶45

(Agoinsl lhe order in op.No. 239 or 2012 on rhe fire or the Motor Accrdenrs croims lribunor-cum_ tX - Additionol Dislrici Judge, Wonoporlhy)

¶46

Appello nllRespo nllRespo ndenl No.2No.2

¶47

Appello nllRespo nllRespo ndenl No.2No.2 Bojol Allionz Genero nsuronce Compony I Lid, represented by ts Deputy Monoger H.No.3-9,4h Floor, Sr mon Romo Towers. Opp.Kol oniketon. Honmon Nogor, i^DilsJkno gor, Hyderobod - S00 060 Respon yL^{G l'.5..} lioners P.Venkootomm o, W/o.Honmonthu, oged:43 I^yeors, Occ:Gov t E.nproyee os Cook. Q/o.l l- t5r a <sup>(., , Nogorkurnool villoge ond mondol t Mo hobubnogor Dislrict. 1n\ to{ Auat-, I Kun'tori Krishnoveni, D/o.Hnomonihu. oged:27 yeors, Occ:Govt Em p oyee o5 Cook, R/o. Ii-i5t, Nogorkurn ool villoge ond m ondol , Mohobubno or District Respon spondenl 3. i H.No. K.Koshonno,1-81 , Neor S/o.Swomyu,Govt School, oged:mo1or,Loknorom i ll I Villoge of Telkopolly Mondol. [No. of proceedings of the Hioh Couri Legol Services Committee: ORDER Roc.No. r eslH cLsC lio2t, oor"c^-so_dizoiii :: Prese nt ::

¶48

/,r,rrl?nl lD. . . 6 jr ,t:r. ,l : Hon'ble Sri Justice p.Noveen Roo, Judge, High Court for lhe Slole oilelongono. : (l) Sri Mellu Goverdhon Reddy, Advocole, High Court for rhe Stote "r i"r"igoiJ'-'

¶49

Nome of Choirmqn

¶50

Nome of Members

¶51

(2) Smt.P.Sujotho,Advocote, High Court for lhe Slote of Telongono.

¶52

AIN/A RD

¶53

The obove Cose belween lhe porlies hoving been referred for delerminolion to the LOK ADALAT ond the porlies hoving compromised lhe cose / motter, lhe following Aword is possed in lerms of lhe seillement:

¶54

This MACMA orises out df'the order doted Og-t2_2014 possed in OP.No.238 ot 2Ol2 on the file of Motor Vehicle Accidenl Cloims Tribunol-cum- IX - Addilionol Districl Judge, Wonoporihy.

¶55

2 The Tribunol hos gronted compensotion of Rs. 2,36,000/- (Rupees Seven Lqkh Thirty Six thousonds only) with cosis ond interest @ 7.5% per onnum from the dote of filing petition io l5-2-20 t3 ond

¶56

r,/r*

¶57

¶58

¶59

I thereofter lrom 12-4-2014 till lhe dote of rea{izolion. Aggrieved b5 the order, the lnsuronce Compony hos preferred this oppeol. ln view of the loiest Judgments of the Hon,ble Supreme Court of lndio, New Delhi, ond in consullolion wiih the Victim, ihe Appellont/lnsuronce Compony intends to wilhdrow the oppeol.

¶60

¶61

The Appellont/2no Responclenl - Bojoj Allionz Generol lnsuronce Compony Limited, represented by Shoik lsmoil Bosho, Asst. Monoger-Legol, her represented lhrough online over the link provided by the High Courl Legol Services Commiliee, High Courl for the Stote of Telongono, ond he seeks permission to withdrow the oppeol. Accordingly, the Appellont is permitted to withdrow.

¶62

In view of lhe obove representolion mode on beholf of the Appello nt/lnsuro nce Comoony, the oppeol stonds disposed of os wilhorown,

¶63

5, The lnsuronce Compony is reody lo deposit the remoining ciecreetcr omounl with occrued interesl ofter^giving due credit^to ihr: omo..rnt olreody deposited, wilhin⁽³⁰⁾ doys from lhe dole^of receipt of copy of lhis oword.

¶64

The^porties ore informed^{thot the court fee, if ony, poid by ony of} lhem sholl be refunded.

¶65

7 . No order os^{1o the coslsof the oppeol.}

¶66

For 844 Alliaqz Genaral lnsurance Co' Ltd ,
-
ised SignatorY
Appellonl/Responde No.2/
lnsuronce ComponY
5,/al'i'*
Choirmon ein er 6mber
-! GAT
f
Dole'.20.02,2021
,HiC
t-Ot r{1,
rl
ofl h e-C.o n1 it ee)
I

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., v. P.Venkaatamma and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., v. P.Venkaatamma and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The National Insurance Company Limited, Karimnagar. Vs Padala Suvarna and 8 Others

The National Insurance Company Limited Vs Khaja Raheemoddin and 2 Others

The Ap State Road Transport Corporation Vs M.S.S.v.Nagaraj

Sripathi Linga Reddy Vs E.Shankar (Major)

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs Ananthula Veeramma

National Insurance Company Limited, Secunderabad. Vs Auty Vijayalaxmi and 7 Others