Disposed

The Ap State Road Transport Corporation v. M.S.S.v.Nagaraj

Telangana HC16 Aug 2021MACMA/156/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court closed the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (MACMA No. 156 of 2013) and a second appeal (MACMA No. 1534 of 2014) arising from a motor accident, as the matter was settled before the Lok Adalat with the parties agreeing to a compromise award.

What did the court decide?

MACMA No. 156 of 2013 and MACMA No. 1534 of 2014 stood disposed of in terms of the Lok Adalat award.

The Ap State Road Transport Corporation Vs… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY. THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T,VINOD KUMAR

¶6

M ACMA.NO.156 0F 2013

¶7

Appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act against the order and decree made in M.V.O.P.No.299 of 2010 daled 21.11.201 1 on the file of the Court of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum- I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad.

¶8

Betwee n:

¶9

The A.P.S.R.T.C., rep by its Managing Director, Bus Bhavan, RTC X Roads, Musheerabad, Hydera bad.

¶10

...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT

¶11

AND

¶12

lV.S.S.V. Nagaraj, S/o. M. Subramanyeswar Rao, aged: 27 years, Occ: System Administrator, F/o.H.No.62-8-3, Srinivasa Nagar, Chintal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶13

...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

¶14

MACMA.MP. NO: 669 OF 2013

¶15

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to stay the execution of the decree and all further proceedings passed in MVOP No.299 of 2010, dated: 21 .11.2O11 on the file before the Chairman Accidents claims Tribunal-cum-l Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad.

¶16

Counsel for the Appellant: SRI C. SUNIL KUMAR REDDY (SC FOR APSRTC)

¶17

Counsel for the Respondent: SRI P. RAJESWARI

¶18

The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

¶19

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICET' VINOD KUM.'\R}

¶20

MACMA No.15^{6 of 2Ot3}

¶21

JUDGMENT:

¶22

It is represented^{by the learned counsel for the appellant that} during the^{pendency of the Motor AccidentCivilMiscellaneousAppeal} before this^{Court, the matterwas referred to Lok Adatat' Uponsuch} reference, the^{matter has been settled beforethe Lok Adalat and an} Award has^{also been passed by the Lok Adalatto thatelTect'}

¶23

In the iight^{of the aforesaid submission,this MACMA is closed} in terms of Award^{dated 10.04.2021passed by the Lok Adalat'}

¶24

Miscellaneous^{petitions, if any pending,shall standclosed'}

¶25

//TRUE COPY//

¶26

Sd/.B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR )'lr-/'

¶27

SECTION OFFICER

¶28

To,

¶29

l.TheChairman,MACT-cum-lAdditionalChiefJudge,CityCivilCourt, Secunderabad.

¶30

One CC to^{Sri C. Sunil Kumar Reddy (SC FORAPSRTC) [OPUC]}

¶31

One CC^{to Sri P. Rajeswari, Advocate [OPUC]}

¶32

Two CD Copies

¶33

One Spare^CoPY

¶34

(Along with a Copy^{of Lok Adalat Award)} gbr

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1610812021

JUDGMENT

MACMA.No.156 of 2013

1 H E r4r
(
o
I 5 sEP 202t a
* *

CLOSING THE MACMA

1 1

BEFORE THE LOK^ADALAT

¶45

HELD AT HYDERABAD

¶46

[Orgonized^{by High Court Legql ServicesCommitlee} High Court lor^{the Slole ol Telongono} (Through Video Conletence^mode)

¶47

l.,nder Section 19 of the legol^{ServicesAutho]iliesAct, 1987 (Cenhol Act)I} MACMA.No'|56^{of 2013 & MACMAN} 534 t 2014

¶48

(Before lhe Hon'ble High^Court)

¶49

¶50

(Agoinsttheorderino'P.No.2ggof20,l0onlhefileoflheChoirmon,MotorAccidenlsCloims Tribunol-cum-l Additionol^{Chief Judge, City Civil Courlot Secunderobod)} MACMA No.^{156 OF 2013}

¶51

Appellont/ResPondent I The A.P.S.R.T.C. {Preseni^TSRT C) Rep. bY ils Monoglng Direcior,^{BusBhovon,RTX} Cross Roods,^{Musheerobod, Hyderobod} M.S.S.V. Nogoroj, Respondent/Pelilioner S/o. M.Subromonyeswor^Roo, Aged 27 Yeors, o C c S s I m d m n st o Io H N o 62 B 3 S n o s N o o r C h n I o R R D s TI c t MACMA No.^{1534 ol 2014} M.S.S.V. Nogoroj, Appello nt/Pelilioner S/o. M.subromonYeswor^Roo, Aged 28^Yeors, OLc: System^{Adminislrotor,H.No 62-8-3'} Srinivos Nog^{or, Chinlol,R.R.Districl} The A.P.S.R.T.C.^{(PresenlTSRTC) ReP.bY} Respondent/ResPondenl its Monoging Director,^{BusBhovon,RTX} Cross Roods, Musheerobod,^Hderobod Courl Legol Services^Commiltee [No.^of Proceedings^{of the High} ORDER ROC.No.737lHCLSC/202 l, Dot ed 07-4-2021) :: Present^:: : Hon'ble Justice^{G. Sri Devi,} Nome of Choirmon Judge, High^{Court for the Slole of Telongono'} Nome of Members : ('l)^{Sri l(.VenkoteshGupto, Advocote'} High Court^{for the Slote of Telongono} (2) Smt.Nondito Guho,^Advocote' High Court^{for the Stole of Telongono'}

¶52

AWARD

¶53

been refened^for 1 The obove Cose^{between the porties hoving} determinotion^{to the LOK ADALATond ihe porties hoving compromisedthe} cose / motter,^{the following Awordis possed in termsof the settlement:}

¶54

-t. GAL S.c
.> o o
1i
!.
*
.i?is;,,fi
/;,
,.?'

¶55

,l.TheChoirmon,MotorAccidenlsCloimsTribunol-cum.lAdditionol Chief Judge,^{City Civil Court ot Secunderobod' hos gronted} compensotion^{of Rs.2,82,000/- with costs ondinterest@ 7 5% pet} onnum from the dote of^{peliiion till the dote of depositof} reolizolion. Aggrieved by^{the soid order, ihe RTC prelened on} oppeol vide^{MACMA No']55 of2013 whereos} the Cloimoni/Petitioner^{preferredon oppeol videMACMA No'} 1534 ol 2014. OL a.

Ihe Respondent/Appellont/Petitioner/Cloimont^{olong wilhhis} counsel hos represented before the virluol Lok Adoloi^hos represented before the Lok Adolot through online over the^link provided by the High Court Legol Services Committee, High Court for the Stote of Telongono.

¶60

The Appellont/Respondent - APSRTC^(NowTSRTC) represented by Sri G.Krupokor Reddy, Low Officer for TSRTC, hos represented before the virluol Lok Adolot through online over the link provided by the High Court Legol Services Committee, High Court for the Stote of Telongono.

¶61

¶62

Both the porties stoted ihot they resolved the dispute omicobly ond entered inio compromise. Respondent/Peiitioner/Appellont/ Cloimont hos submitted copy of Aodhor Cord in proof of his identificotion.

¶63

During the pendoncy of both the oppeols, both the porties stoted thot they resolved the dispute omicobly ond enlered into compromise.

¶64

¶65

The Respondent/Appellont/Petitioner/Cloimont is ogreed to receive Rs. 2,39,700/- (Rupees Two lokhs thirty nine thousond seven hundred only) with interest @ 6% per onnum from the dote of petition till lhe dote of reolizotion ond the Appellont/TSRTC olso ogreed for the some. Accordingly, oword is possed.

¶66

r.L s[lii 1 6
HIGi.i COi]PT
:i. LOI( /r DA Lii'i *
'{.

¶67

The Appelloni/TSRTC hos to deposit the soid omounl of Rs.2,39,200/(Rupees Two lokhs thirty nine lhousond seven hundred only) with interesl @ 6% per onnum rrom the dote of petilion iill the dote of reolizotion wilhin o period of three (3) months from lhe dote of receipt of copy of this owcrrd ofier giving due credit to the omount olreody deposited.

¶68

¶69

Upon such deposit, ihe Respondent/Peiitioner/Rppellonl/Cloimont is permitled to withdrow the enlire omount.

¶70

ln terms of the compromise orrived of between lhe porties, both the oppeols i.e., MACMA No.156 of 20i3 & MACMA No.l534 ot 2O14 stonds disposed of.

¶71

10.The porties ore informed thot lhe court fee, if ony, poid by ony of them before lower court sholl be refunded.

¶72

¶73

a@W' \a"a;f'

¶74

).
t
I
Petitioners (s)
ftg Respondent (s)
Rotgon l-.,rqr
H-sll "'
I ffiRle: TAW Eus OFFICER.II gnavan, Hyrj,
Counsel for petitioner (s)
counsel for Resp
n ent (s)
L'
,\xon \tt\ A^A"I*
Chailman
M em [:er
Member

¶75

Date:10.4.2021

¶76

!..
o a i !ut<br>H\CH.
t:) LCK f.'O;tUXf
Sl;tr rtr.
(Seal of the Committee)

The Ap State Road Transport Corporation v. M.S.S.v.Nagaraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Ap State Road Transport Corporation v. M.S.S.v.Nagaraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Pitchaiah Vs The Commandant 8th Bn.

Zia- Ul- Islam Educational Society Vs Sri Rajendra R. Pillay

A.Laxmi Narayana Vs The District Collector (Sw), Mahabubnagar.

The National Insurance Company Limited, Karimnagar. Vs Padala Suvarna and 8 Others

The National Insurance Company Limited Vs Khaja Raheemoddin and 2 Others

A. Venugopal Vs Hermas Tavels and Cargo Pvt.Ltd., and Another