Allowed

The National Insurance Company Limited, Karimnagar. v. Padala Suvarna and 8 Others

Telangana HC16 Aug 2021MACMA/456/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court closed the Motor Accidents Claims Miscellaneous Appeal. The matter was settled before the Lok Adalat, resulting in the appellant being permitted to withdraw the appeal. The Insurance Company was directed to deposit the decretal amount within 90 days.

What did the court decide?

Appellant permitted to withdraw the appeal. Insurance Company directed to deposit the remaining decretal amount with accrued interest within 90 days.

The National Insurance Company Limited, Karimnagar… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

IVONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶5

M.A.C.M.A. NO:456 OF 20'll

¶6

Appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgmenU order and decree made in MVOP No.95 of 2008 dated 1311012010 on the file of the Court of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum- ll Additional District Judge, Karimnagar at Jagitial.

¶7

Between:

¶8

The National lnsurance Company Limited, Branch Manager, Rep.by its Branch Manager, Fl/o. I Floor, H.No.2-6-'103, Near Municipal Office, Karimnagar. (Policy No.551300/3'1/0716300000489 covering valid period from 16-06-2007 to 15-062008)

¶9

,..APPELLANT/ RESPONDENT NO.3 AND

¶10

Padala Suvarna, Wo Ramesh House hold

¶11

Padala Venkatesh, S/o Ramesh aged 15 years, Student

¶12

Padala Srinivas, S/o Ramesh aged 13 years, Student

¶13

Padala Srikanth, S/o Ramesh aged 11 years, Student,

¶14

(Respondents 2 to 4 being minols, rep.'by therr mother natural guardian the 1"t Respondent)

¶15

Padal Gangu, W/o Chinna Rajam house hold

¶16

Pada Chinna Rajam, S/o Ra.jaiah Agriculture

¶17

P adala Geetha, D/o Chinna Rajam house hold

¶18

(All Fi"/o Dalur Village of Kathlapur Mandal)

¶19

B. Dasarathi Mahesh, S/o Komuraiah Drlver of Tipper Lorry bearing No. AP^'1 5 U 6677 F/o Buggaram Village, Dharmapur Mandal.

¶20

B. Suganakar Rao, S/o Ramarao Owner of Driver of Tipper Lorry bearing No.AP 15 u 6677, Rr/o H.No.1-4-25, Adarshnasar'".i1,.,{#EtiJ,J3^:T.?!?}1fl31,11,

¶21

For the Appellant : SRI K.SITA RAM, Advocate

¶22

For the Respondents :

¶23

The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

¶24

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAFI

¶25

MAC No.456 of 20tt

¶26

JUDGMENT:

¶27

It is represented by the learned Counsel for the appellant that during the pendency of the Motor Accident civil Miscelraneous Appeal belore this Court, the matter was referred to Lok Adalat. Upon such reference, the matter has been settled before the Lok Adalat and an Award has also been passed by the Lok Adalat to that effect.

¶28

In the light of the aforesaid submission, this MACMA is closed in terms of Award dated 1O.O4.2O21 passed by the Lok Adalat.

¶29

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

¶30

¶31

ASSlsrANr Sd/.K.AMMAJI*=orty //rRUE copy//

¶32

SECTION OFFICER

¶33

The chairman, Motor Accidents claims Tribunal -cum- ll Additional District -^Judge, -Jagitial^{at Karimnagar.} ?. 9ne^{CC to Sri K.Sita Ram;Advocate} (OpUC)

¶34

Two CD Copies .

¶35

One Spare Copy Kj.

HIGH COURT

DATED:1610812021

ORDER

MACMA.No.456 of 2011

1 Y\L 'iA rA-
(
i
cL) 21 sP2021
2

D

CLOSING THE MACMA.

h)4

I I

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶47

HELD AT HYDERABAD

¶48

[Orgonized by High Court Legol Services Commillee High Courl for lhe Slote of Telongono (Ihrough Video Conference moael

¶49

Under Section l9 of the legol Services Authorities Act, l rgT (Cenkol Act)]

¶50

MACMA No. 456 of 2O.tl

¶51

(Before lhe Hon,ble High Court)

¶52

(Against the order in o.p.No.95 0f 2oo8 0n the fire of the chairman, Motor Accidents craims Tribunal-cum-ll Additional District Judge, Xurirnnuga. at Jagtial).

¶53

ont/RespondentNo.3 Appell	h T N i o n o o ns U once o L d R b s p Y Bra C n n o o r R o F o o s No 2 6- N o U M nc o of e c o K m ri p Po cY No 5 5 300 3 07 630000 4 0 9I Co e n o d s n e d o Iom 6-0 p 2 6- 7 00 5 6 -0 o d o r m 2 0 00 2 4 o 2 0 00 nogor, 2008) h H 03, I to
Respondents/pelilioners	uvorno,!V/o.Romesh,oged33 yeors,Occ;Household. PodoloS
2	Podolo Venkotesh,S/o yeors,occ:student. Romesh,ogedls
3	PodoloSrinivos,S/o Occ:Studenl Romesh,ogedl3yeoa
t's,li"l'11 4 SrjF *	Romesh,og.edllyeors, PodoloSrikonth,S/o Occ:Studen1. Respondents2lo4ore minorsrepresenledby theirmother noturolguordionthelsr respondent)
5	ongtr,W/o. ChinnoRojonr,oged53 yeors,Occ:Household. Fcdoloc
6	innoRojom,S/o. Rojoioh,oged5g y,eors,Occ:Agricullure Pr:doloCh
7	f'odoloGeeiho, D/o. ChinnoR (AllR/o. DolurVlllogeofKoihlopurr,1ondol) ojom.oged /o )/eors,^{Occ:Household.}
Respondents/Pelilioners B	Dosorolhi Mohesh, S/o.Komuroioh,oged26 'y'eors,Occ:Driver ofTipperLorrybeoring No.AP-I5-U-6627,R/o. BuggoromVitloge DhormopurMondol.
I	B.SugnokorRoo,S/o. Romoroo,oged38 yeors,Occ:Owner ofDriver of TipperLorry beoringNo.AP.l5-U-6677,R/o.H.No.l-4-25, AdorshnogorlocolifyofMetpollyproperond rnondol.

¶54

[No.^{of proceedings of the High CouriLegol Services} Committee: ORDER ROC.N o.737 INCISC/2021 , ated A7-4-20211

,4*

! l

:l Presenl^::

Nome of Choirmon

Nqme of Members

: Hon'ble Sri Justice^{P.Noveen Roo,} Judge, l{igh Court^{for the Stoteof Telongono'}

¶63

: ('l ) Sri Chollori^{Nogesworo Roo,Advocote,} High Court for^{the Stole of Telongono}

¶64

(2) Smt.P.S. Monjulo Kumtlr,^Advocole, High Court for^{the Stote of Telongono'}

¶65

AWARD

¶66

TheoboveCosebetweentheportieshovingbeenreferredfor determinotion to^{the LoK ADALATond the porties hoving compromisedthe} cose/moiter,thefollowingAwordispossedintermsoftheseltlement:

¶67

l.This,MACMAorisesoutoftheorderdoted,]3-10-2010po.ssedin o.P.No.gsof2oosonthe.fileoftheChoirmon,MotorAccidents Cloims Tribunol-Cum-^{l| AdditionolDistricl Judge, Korimnogor o1} Jogtiol.

¶68

2.TheTribunolhosgronledcompensotionofRs'5'72'600/-(Rupees Five lokh seventy^{two thousond six hundredonly) with proportionoie} costs ond interest^{@ 7.5% pel onnum from the dote of petition till the} dote of deposit.^{Aggrievedby the order,the lnsuronce Compony} hos Prefened this^oPPeol.

¶69

Ihe Appellont/Respondent^No'3 -^{NotionollnsuronceCompony} Limited, represented by^{limt.SujothoK.Kr.rmor, Monoger, hos} epresented before the^Loll Adolol^{through online overthe} ink rovided by the High Court Legol^{ServicesCommittee,High Court}

¶70

"i^{or the Stote of Telongono. In view of the lotest Judgments of the} Hon'ble Supreme Court of Indio, New Delhi,^{ond in consultotion with} the victim, the Appellont/lnsuronce Comporry^{intends to wilhdrow} the oppeol. Accordingly, the Appellont^{is pertnittedto withdrow.}

¶71

SEiI V/C
(
o5 ^ nr \R1
o '^'llXJ'^'o-
1r)

¶72

ln view of the obove representotion mode on beholf of the Appellont/lnsuronce Compony, the oppeol stonds disposed os withdrown.

¶73

The lnsuronce Compony is reody to deposit the remoining decreetol omount with occrued interest ofter^giving due credit to the omounl olreody deposited, within (90) cJoys from the dote of receipt of copy of this oword.

¶74

The porlies ore informed thoi the courl fee, if ony, poiO by ony of ihem sholl be refunded. \lr"/

¶75

\lr"/

¶76

¶77

*"
7 No order os to the cosis of lhe oppeol.

¶78

B.
zJ . Ltci.
Fo( NS

¶79

<z<rerrer-trf
i'd SrgnaJQrY
Appellonls/Respondent No.3/
lnsur n Com
..:
P
Choirmqn Metnbertl k M mber
E RV
(r
Dote: I 0.4.2021 C
o
H\GH
ee)

The National Insurance Company Limited, Karimnagar. v. Padala Suvarna and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The National Insurance Company Limited, Karimnagar. v. Padala Suvarna and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Pitchaiah Vs The Commandant 8th Bn.

Zia- Ul- Islam Educational Society Vs Sri Rajendra R. Pillay

A.Laxmi Narayana Vs The District Collector (Sw), Mahabubnagar.

The National Insurance Company Limited Vs Khaja Raheemoddin and 2 Others

The Ap State Road Transport Corporation Vs M.S.S.v.Nagaraj

A. Venugopal Vs Hermas Tavels and Cargo Pvt.Ltd., and Another