Allowed

The National Insurance Company Limited v. Khaja Raheemoddin and 2 Others

Telangana HC16 Aug 2021MACMA/394/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the appellant National Insurance Company to withdraw its Motor Accidents Claims Miscellaneous Appeal. The matter was settled via a Lok Adalat award granting compensation, leading to the closure and dismissal of the appeal.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn by the appellant for a compromise amounting to Rs. 2 lakhs plus interest.

The National Insurance Company Limited Vs Khaja… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

IVONDAY. THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶6

M.A.C.M.A. NO: 394 OF 2012

¶7

Appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, against the JudgmenU order and decree made in MVOP No.1 60 ol 2007 dated¹ 5/09/201¹ on the file of the Court^of the Charrman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum-^{lV Additional DistrictJudge} (FTC) Karimnagar.

¶8

Between:

¶9

The National lnsurance Company^{Limited, rep. Branch Olfice22-3-27 4/B/C,1't Floor,} Beside Andhra Bank, FCI X Roail, Jyothi^{Nagar, Karimangar District, Rep. by itsAuth.} Signatory, Hyderabad Regional^{Office, Ju6ilee Building, NampallyStationRoad,} Hvderabad

¶10

...A,'ELLANT/RES,.NDENT

¶11

AND

¶12

1, Khaja Raheemoddin, S/o.Khaia^{Kareemuddln Lorry Driver R/o AshokNagar,} Godavarikhani of Ramaqundam^{Mandal, of KarimnagarDistrict}

¶13

Chinthakindi Kanakaianls/o.^{Rajaiah Driverof LorrybearingNo AP-7-U-4056} R/o.Kannal Village of^{Karmanpui Mandal' of KarimnagarDistrict} . . . ^ -^

¶14

Gade Srinivas, 5/o.^{Rajamallu Owner of Lorry bearingNoAP-7-U-4^05^6} R/o.Tilaknagar, Godasvarikhani.^{(Petitroenrand Responden,t} )."C1$r'J*O=*ra

¶15

For the Appellant : SRI S.AGASTHYA^{SARMA,Advocate}

¶16

For the Respondent No.1^{: SRIA'RAJENDER KUMAR' Advocate}

¶17

For the Respondent^{No.2 : SRI VENKATESHWARA RAO VARANASI' Advocate}

¶18

The Court delivered^{the following: JUDGMENT}

¶19

¶20

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICET' VINODKUMAR}

¶21

MAN^{o.394of 2012}

¶22

JUDG

¶23

It is^{representedby the learned Counselfor the appellant} that during^{the pendency of the MotorAccident Civil Miscellaneous} Appeal^{before this Court' the matter was referredto l'ok Adalat'} Upon^{such reference,the matter has been settled before the Lok} Adulat^{.rnd an Award has also been passedby the Lok Adalat to} thrLt^c illct,

¶24

ln the light^{of the aforesaid submission' this MACMAis} closed in^{terms of Awarddated lO 'O4 '2021 passedby the Lok} Adalat.

¶25

Miscellaneous^{petitions,if any pending' shallst.andclosed'}

¶26

Sd/.B.SATYAVATHI ASS^{ISTANT REGISTRAR}

¶27

,TRUE COPYII

¶28

SE TION OFFICER

¶29

To ,. -n" Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum- lV Additio , LXt³ SI""3^{;'1"'iTl3'nn?:S a rm a, Ad vo cat"} I9Pl9⁾

¶30

6;; cc i;^{6ti A.nijenobr Kumar, Advocate(oPUc)}

¶31

;. o;; cc io sri^{vent<atesrrwaii Rao, Varanasi' Advocate (OPUC)}

¶32

Two CD^CoPies

¶33

One Spare^CoPY

¶34

(alonq with a coPY of award)

istrict

Kj.

t\q

HIGH COURT

<br>

DATED:16/08/2021

ORDER

MACMA.No.394 of 2012

:/
./ 1Yt E : i4.iE-
'+ N
A'<br>ooJ 1 6 SEP 2021 az
\3a *
<br>, ^"-='.rc

CLOSING THE MACMA.

tri,.f

BEFORE THE LOK ADALA,T

¶49

HEID AT HYDER,ABAD

¶50

[Orgonized by High Courl legol Services Committee High Courl for the Sloie of Telonqono

¶51

(Through Video Conference mJOel

¶52

Under Seclion l9 of the Legol Services Authorilies Act, I987 (Centrot Act)J

¶53

MACMA No. 394 ot 2012

¶54

(Before lhe Hon,bte High Court)

¶55

(Against the order in o.p.No. 160 0f 2QO7 0n the fire of the chairman, Motor Accidents claims Tribunal-cum_ tV Additional District Judge tniCl ut xurirnnugu.l

¶56

Appellonl/Respondenl

¶57

The Notionol lnsuronce Co. Ltd., Rep. Bronch Otfice,22-3-27 4/BC/C, t,i floor, Beside Andhro Bonk, FCI X Rood, Jyothi Nogor, Korimnogor Dislrici. Rep by its Auih. Signotory, Hyderobod Regionol Office, Jubilee Building, Nompolly Stotion RooC, Hyderobod.

¶58

Respondenis Khcrjo Roheemocidiln, S/o. Khojo Koreemuddin, Aged 22 yeors, Occ: Lorry briver, R/o. Ashok l..logor, Godovorikhoni of SE^{II ,} Romog undom r,\ondol of Korimnogor^District. 2 Chinihokindi Konkoioh, S/o. Rojoioh,^{Age 35} yer-rrs, Podmosholi, Occ: Driver of Lorry, beorilng No. AP-7-U-4056,^{R/o.Konnol Villoge} t'.!xisitl1 of l(ormonpur Mondol^{of KorimnogorDistrict.} 3 Gcde Srinivos, S/o.^{Rojomollu, Age 40 yeors,} Sr.; Occ: Owner of^{Lorry beoringNo,AP-7-U-4056,} R/o. Tiloknogor, Godovorikhoni.^(P.etitioner ond Respondents^{No.l & 2),} 1ttto.^{of proceedings of the Hlgh Couri Legol Services Comml} 1i ee bnorn noc.N o.t3t ll,cLSCl2o2l,^{Doted07-4-20211}

Respondenis

:: Present ::

Nome of Choirmon

: Hon'ble^{Sri Justice P'NoveenRoo,}

¶63

Judge, High^{Court for the Siote of Telongono}

¶64

Nome of Members : (l ) Sri Chollori^{Nogesworo Roo, Advocote'} High Court^{f or the Stole of Telongono}

¶65

(2) Snrt.P'S. Monjulo^{Kumor.Advocote'} High Court^{f or lhe Stote of Telongono'}

¶66

AWARD

¶67

The obove^{cose betweenthe portieshoving been referredfor} ies hoving^{compromised the} determinotion^{to the LOK ADALAT ond ihe port} cose /^{motter, the following Aword is possedin terms of the setilemeni:}

¶68

l. This MACMA^{orises out of the order doted l5-09-2011 possed'in} O.P.No.l60^{of 2007 on the file of lhe Choirmon' MotorAcqidents} Cloims^{Tribunol-cum- lV Additionol District Judge (f,fc) oi} Korimnogor'

¶69

The^{Tribunolhos gronted compensoiion of Rs 2'00'000i-(Rupees} Two^{lokhs only) wlth proportionotecosts ond inleresl @ 7 '5% Qer} onnum^{from lhe dote of peiition till the dote of deposii Aggrieved} by theorder,thelnsuronceComponyhospreferredihisoppeol'

$j I

\iI tr\t

rdent -^{t'totionftlnsuronce Compony Limitc* 4rfur} \

¶75

represented^{by Smt'suioiho K'Kumor'Monoger'hos represented} \ before^{rhe ror. noorot irrrough online over rhe link provided by the} High^{Court L"gof s"wit"sC-ommiltee' High Court for the Stoteof} Telongono^{ln view of the lotest Judgmenls oi lhe Hon'bleSupreme} Court^{of lndio' New Delhi' ond in consultotionwilh ihe victim'the} Appellont/lnsuronce^{Compony intendsto withdrowthe oppeol'} Accordingly,^{the Rppellont is permilied to wilhdrow'}

¶76

ln view^{of ihe obove represeniotionmode on beholfof the} Appellont/lnsuronce^{Compony'the oppeolslonds disposedos} wlihdrown.

¶77

The^{lnsuronce ComPonYis reodY to dePosit the remqinlng} decreetol^{omountwi.lh Gccruedinterestofter giving due creditto} theomountolreodydepclsited,within(90)doysfromthedoteof receipt of^{coPYof this oword'}

¶78

The^{porties ore informedthot the court fee' if ony' poid by ony of} them sholl be^refunded.

¶79

7 No order os to ihe costs of lhecpP eo l. h
For National ln C;o. Ltd.
:l 5:=nc rz-o-af
sed Siq natory
Appellcnts/ResPondent /
lnsuronce Com on
t'jJ 1.,a*-z,"-13't:
Member
Choirmon
k.,
s S! L';
,l0.4.2021 O
IIIOH COURl
C
LOK ADALAT t
(se ee)

¶80

Doie:^,l0.4.2021

The National Insurance Company Limited v. Khaja Raheemoddin and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The National Insurance Company Limited v. Khaja Raheemoddin and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Pitchaiah Vs The Commandant 8th Bn.

Zia- Ul- Islam Educational Society Vs Sri Rajendra R. Pillay

A.Laxmi Narayana Vs The District Collector (Sw), Mahabubnagar.

The National Insurance Company Limited, Karimnagar. Vs Padala Suvarna and 8 Others

The Ap State Road Transport Corporation Vs M.S.S.v.Nagaraj

A. Venugopal Vs Hermas Tavels and Cargo Pvt.Ltd., and Another