Disposed

A. Venugopal v. Hermas Tavels and Cargo Pvt.Ltd., and Another

Telangana HC16 Aug 2021MACMA/3257/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, the High Court accepted the representation that the matter had been referred to and settled by the Lok Adalat. Consequently, the appeal was closed as per the Awards dated 20/02/2021, disposing of the MACMA No. 3257 of 2012.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is closed in terms of the Lok Adalat Award dated 20/02/2021.

A. Venugopal Vs Hermas Tavels and Cargo Pvt.Ltd., and Another — Insurance | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

N/ONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST

¶3

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶6

M.A.C.M.A. NO: 3257 OF 2012

¶7

Appeal under Section^'173 of M.V.Act, against the^judgmenU decree in^OP No.1662 ol 2012 dated 20/06/2012 on the file of the^{Courtof the MotorAccidents} Claims Tribunal -cum- lll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court,^{at Hyderabad.}

¶8

Between:

¶9

A.Venugopal, S/o. A.Srinivasa Rao, Occ: Business,^{Presentlynil, R/o} . Flat No. 563, Gokul Plots, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

¶10

...APPELLANT

¶11

AND

¶12

Hermas Travels and Cargo Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by B.Nanchariah, D.No.^1-11-304, Basavanathapuram, lClCl Bank Lane, Begumpet, Hyderabad.

¶13

lClCl Lombard General lnsurance Company Ltd.,^{Rep.by its l,4anager, UP Stair,} Loft Show Room, Nagarjuna Circle, Panjagutta,^Hyderabad.

¶14

..,RESPONDENTS

¶15

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶16

Petition under Order Vl Rule 17 R/w. Section^{151 of CPC praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^{High Court may be pleasedto} permit the petitioner to enhance the claim amount from Rs. 6,00,000/- to Rs.10,00,000/- by way of amendments in OP No. 1662 of^{2010 on the file of the} TVACT-Cum-lll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabadⁱⁿ the^{interest of} Justice and pass

¶17

For the Appellant : SRI K.HARIMOHAN REDDY, Advocate

¶18

For the Respondent No.2 : SRI N.MOHAN KRISHNA, Advocate

¶19

The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

¶20

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICET' VINOD KUMAR}

¶21

MAC MAN^{o.357 of} oL2

¶22

JUDG^MENT:

¶23

It is represented^{by the learned counsel for the appellant that} during^{the pendency of the Motor AccidentCivilMiscellarreous Appeal} before this^{Court, the matterwas referred to Lok Adalat' Upon such} reference,^{the matter has been settled beforethe Lok Adalat and an} Award^{has also been passed by the Lok Adalat to that effect'}

¶24

In the light^{of the aforesaid submission' this MACMAis closed} in terms^{of Award daled20'02'2021 passed by the Lok Ada1at'}

¶25

Miscellaneous^{petitions,if any pending'sha1l standclosed'}

¶26

Sd/.K.AMMAJI ASSiSTANT^REGISTRAR ,TRUE^COPY//

¶27

SECTION^OFFICER

¶28

To t The Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum- lll Aclditional^{Chief Judge'}

¶29

"stint{'iHrffi lh#llffili;ir"Jssi "' ; Ei'?[ f

¶30

Two CD^CoPies'

¶31

One^{SPare CoPY}

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 6/08/2021

JUDGMENT

MACMA.No.3257 of 2012

¶37

CLOSING THE MACMA.

¶38

TH E S14
(
/q
t
ao i2l sEP202t
c
t_
*
.r. tP /,,,
j

¶39

b
q

¶40

lsrltsssf

¶41

BEFORE THE I-OK ADAIAT

¶42

HELD AT HYDERABAD

¶43

[Orgonized^{by High CourlLegol SetvicesCommitlee} High Court for lhe Slole of^Telongono

¶44

(Ihrough Video Conference mode)

¶45

Under Seclion 1 I of the Legol Seryices^{AulhoriliesAct,1987 (Cenlrol Act)l}

¶46

MACMA No. 3257 ol2012

¶47

(BefoIe lhe Hon'ble High Court)

¶48

(Agoinst lhe order in o.P.No. 1662 of 20',lO on lhe^{file ol} lhe choirmon,^{MotorAccidenls cloims} Tlibunol-c um-lll Addl Chiert Judge:^{City Civil Courlsol Hyderobod)}

¶49

Appello nt ,lr. A. Venugopol, S/o. A. Srinivoso^Roo. Aged 24 years Occ:^{Business,presenllynii,} R/o. Flot N0.563, Gokul^{Plots, KPHB Colony,} Kukoipolly, Hyderobod Resp ondenl l Hermos Trovesl ond Corgo^{Pvt., Ltd.,} Rep. by B. Nonchoroioh, D-No.l-ll-304, Bosovo nolhopuro m, lClCl^Bonklone, Begumpet, Hyderbod. i- unr 2 lclcl Lombord Generol Insuronce^Co.Lrd., J( ./; o4( 4 T Rep. by its lr/onoger, Up Stoir,^LoftShow I roc,..n, Nogorjuno circle,^Ponjogutto, o lHyderobod. lNo.^{of proceedingsof the Hi} Court Legol Services^Committee ORDER ROC.No.^I 95/HCLSC/20 1, Doted 3Q-01-20211

¶50

:: Presenl ::

¶51

Nome of Choirmon

¶52

: Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Noveen Roo, J ge, High Courl for the Stote of Telongono.

¶53

Nome of Members :(l) Sri Mettu Goverdhon^{Reddy, Advocote,} gh Court for lhe Stote of Telongono

¶54

(2) S P.Sujotho, Advocote, Hish Coupfor the Stote^{of Telongono.}

¶55

AWARD

¶56

The obove cose between^{ihe porties hoving been referred for} delerminolion to the^{LoK ADALAT ond the poriieshoving compromisedthe} cose / moiter, the^{following Awordis possed in lerms of ihe setilement:}

¶57

l. This MACMA orises out^{of ihe order doted 20-6-2012in} oP.No'l662ot2OlOonthefileoftheChoirmon,MotorVehlcle Accident Cloims Tribunol-cum.^{lll Addl ChiefJudge:CityCivil Courts} ol HYderobod.

¶58

2.TheTribunolhosgronteclcompetrsoiionofRs'l'50'600/-(Rupees oneLokhFiflyThousondSixHundredonly)Aggrievedbytheorder, the Cloimonts hove^{preferredihis oppeol' During the pendoncyof} oppeol both the^{porties hove compromised the motter'}

s;d.l*

The Appellonts^{olong with their counselSri K. Hori} Mohon Reddy Advocote, hove represented^{before the virtuol} Lok Adolot by Legol Services^'td*

¶65

ottending in the office of^{Secretory, HighCourt} il

¶66

Committee, High Court for^{the Sloteof Telongono.}

¶67

Ihe 2nd Respondent -lCICl^{Lombord lnsuronceCompony Limiled,} represented by Sri Mohommed^{Bobu,Slole' heod legol, hos} represented through online over^{the link provided by the HighCourt} Legol Services Commiltee, High Courl^{for the Stote of Telongono.}

¶68

¶69

Both the^porties stoled thot^{they resolvedthe d spute omicoblyond} entered into compromise. The Appellont/Petitioner^{hove produced} copy of Aodhor Cords in^proof of their identific<rtion.^{The molter hos} been settled omicobly between the^porties.

¶70

The Respondent No.2/lnsuronce Compony is willing 1o^poy Rs.1,75,000/- (Rupees ,Qne..-tokh Sevenly Five Thousond^'only) :^l.,' :?

¶71

towords f ull ond finoi' sellleriienl . ond the Appellonl/Pelitioner^is ogreed to receive the.s,ome towords full ond finol settlemeni oporl from the oworded orridunt before the lower co rrt.

¶72

Accordingly the oword.,is possed for the obove soid omount of Rs.1 ,75,000/- (Rupees One Lokh Seventy Five Thousond only) towords full ond finol selllement.

¶73

B. The Respondent No.2/lnsuronce Compony hos to deposil the soid omount of Rs,1,75,000/- (Rupees One Lokh Seventy Five Thousond ly) towords full ond finol selllement within o period of two (2) ths from the dote of receipt of copy of this oword ofter givlng redit lo the omount olreody deposited. 1n the even.f of defoult loy in moking such deposit, the omount poyoble sholl cony

¶74

resl oI 12% p.o. from the dote of defoult.

¶75

Out of full ond finol seltlement omount, the Appellont/Petitioner is permitted to withdrow the eniire omount os cnd when deposited by the lnsuronce Compony.

¶76

ln terms of the compromise orrived ot between the porties, this cose stonds disposed of.

¶77

1 1.The porties ore informed thol the court fee, if cny, poid by ony of them before lower court sholl be refunded.

r&d

5,,rLb

*.,'!I
BoE.flso'd&S
-ri
.tl
Appellonl / Cloimont I Res nce on
Counsel for ResPondenl No.2
9/4-
Counsel for ellont/ Cloimont /lnsuton ce Com n
p S*-^-se. 5,irjh'
Choirmqn e mber mefnber

¶86

DaIe:20.02.2021

¶87

HIGH
(s

¶88

.,,'l:

A. Venugopal v. Hermas Tavels and Cargo Pvt.Ltd., and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A. Venugopal v. Hermas Tavels and Cargo Pvt.Ltd., and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Pitchaiah Vs The Commandant 8th Bn.

Zia- Ul- Islam Educational Society Vs Sri Rajendra R. Pillay

A.Laxmi Narayana Vs The District Collector (Sw), Mahabubnagar.

The National Insurance Company Limited, Karimnagar. Vs Padala Suvarna and 8 Others

The National Insurance Company Limited Vs Khaja Raheemoddin and 2 Others

The Ap State Road Transport Corporation Vs M.S.S.v.Nagaraj