High Court at Hyderabad dismissed the Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 as infructuous because the underlying suit had been disposed of long prior. Pending miscellaneous petitions were also dismissed.
The Civil Revision Petition and miscellaneous petitions were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.935 OF 2013
Petition filed under Article 227 ol lhe Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order Dated. 29-1-20'13 passed in lA No. 11612012 in os No. 4112010 on the file of the senior Civil Judge, Sathupally, Khammam District
Between:
Khammam District
Khammam Town and District
Khammam Town and District
......PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS NOS 1, 3. AND 8 TO 12
AND
.....RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF NOS 2 AND 4 TO 7 l'A' No: 1 oF 2013(cRpMp' No: 1264 oF 2013): petition under Sectron 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in os No. 41l20i0 on the fire of learned Senior civir Judge' sathupary, Khammam District, pending the disposar of cRp. Counset for the petitioner: SRt, KOWTURU P,AVAN KUMAR Counset for the Respondent No.1: Snf o .faf pai;iEil;' Counset for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 6: NdN;;ijp-Eirieo
The Court made the following: ORDER
Thc Ho r'bleSri Jus ticc A' V c nl<rttc-! 1rs'ir-rir -R e dcl)'
o.9 35<r fz013 C Y1lRcv1s1onPcti ti ttll
Qglgr:
Leamedc( unsel for the revision petitioners submits that the suit
in O.S.No.41of - O10 itselfwas disposed of long back
lwhile rec< rding his submission, thisGvil RevisLon Petitionis dismissedas in tructuous' Consequently' Miscellaneous Petitions'
pendingif anY, sr md dismissed'
SD/.K.AMMAJI
//TRUECOPY'
ASSISTANTREGISTRAR tL-
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
1 . r h e seni o r y lr -ci 2. One CCto Sri Kowturr J y d s ;9.?ll"[,:ll,v;|.P-avi :X6,[L1I 13 Fllt"i
'3. 5;; 6c i; 5;i D. Jaipz Reddv Advocate [oPUC]
HIGH COURT
DATED:091121i 021
1trE S IA l .c-
,.koe-
j>
f'
1 [ Jril 2022
.::
-t
i;-^ -. .r1-
t:E-"
ORDER
CRP.No.935 ol2013
DISMISSINGT HE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTt,}OUS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 is maintainable given that the underlying suit was disposed of long ago.
Whether to discharge pending miscellaneous petitions.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kakkirala Ramalingam
Jallipalli Pundarikakshudu
Seemakurthi Visalakshi
Seemakurthi Bhramaramba
Jallipalli Leelavathi
Jallipalli Suresh
A. Venkateswara Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
