Dismissed

Ajay Reddy Vongala v. Harika Reddy Tula

Telangana HC8 Dec 2021CRP/1453/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed two civil revision petitions on the understanding that the parties settled the matrimonial dispute and agreed to file for judicial separation under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act. The court vacated earlier interim stays.

What did the court decide?

Civil revision petitions dismissed; interim stay vacated; instructions issued to Family Court to consider pending application for judicial separation.

Ajay Reddy Vongala Vs Harika Reddy Tula — Telangana HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWAR.A REDDY

¶5

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1453 AND 1480 OF 2019

¶6

CIVIL REVISION PETIT ION NO: 1453 OF 2019

¶7

CRP filed under Article 227 of the Constitution oF India, the order dated 11.12.2018 passed ln LA, No. t770 of 2018 in O.P. No. 198 of 2015 on the tile of the Principal Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional Chief Judge, Hyderabad

¶8

Between:

¶9

Ajay Reddy Vongala, Rep., by his SPA Holder Smt. Vongala Jaya Lakshmi Devi Reddy Wo late Jai Prakash Reddy, aged about 55 years, Occ. Teacher, R/o. 1-2382/G,Gaganmahal Road, Domalaguda, Hyderabad-29

¶10

.....^pETITION ER/ RESPONDENT/ PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

Harika Reddy Tula, W/o Ajay Reddy Vongala, Presently r/o USA, Permanent r/o. H. No.2-4-623, Ramnagar, Hanamkonda, Warangal.

¶13

.....RESPON DENT/ PETITION ER/ RESPONDENT

¶14

IA NO: 1OF 2021

¶15

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petltion, the High Court may be^pleased To extend the interim stay granted in LA.No.1 of 2019 in C.R.P.No.1453 of 2019 d1.25/212020 until disposal of the main Civil Revision Petition or any other date

¶16

IA NO: 1OF 2019

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{statedin the} affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^may be^{pleasedto suspend} the order dated 11-12-2018 in I.A. No. 1770 of^{2018 ln O.P.No. 198 of 2015 on the} tile of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional^{Chief Judge'} Hyderabad, pending disposal of the CRP

¶18

IA NO: 2 oF 202L

¶19

Pefltion under section 151 cPC^praying that^{in the circumstancesstatedin the} affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleased To dispose} of the above CRP by directing the^{Honble Principal ludge, FamilyCourt-cum-} Additional Chief Judge, Hyderabad, to^{convert the OP No.19Bof 2015 filedby the} petitioner for grant of decree of divorce into the one^filed for^{grant of consent} decree under Section 1313 of^{the HM Act}

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI.^{H VENUGOPAL}

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent:^{SRI M VIJAYA KANTH}

¶22

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1480 OF 2019

¶23

CRP filed under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of India, the order dated 11.12.2018 passed in I.A. No. 1769 of 2018 in O.P. No 198 of 2015 on the file of learned Principal Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional Chief Judge, Hyderabad

¶24

Between:

¶25

Alqy ReddV Vongala, Rep.by his SPA Holder Smt. Vongala Jaya Lakshmi Devi Reddy Wo^{late Jai Prakash} Reddy, aged about 55^years. Occ. Teacher, R/o. 1-2-382lG, Gaganmahal Road, Domalaguda, Hyderabad-29

¶26

,.... PETITIONER,I RESPON DETVT/ RESPON DENT

¶27

AND

¶28

Harika Reddy Tula, Wo Ajay Reddy Vongala, Presently r/o USA,^permanent r/o H.No,2-4-623,Ramnagar, Hanamkonda, Warangal.

¶29

.....RESPONDENT/PETITION ER/ PETITIONER

¶30

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶31

Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 79 days in representation of the above C.R.p.S.R.No. B7B5 of 2019.

¶32

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶33

Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased pleased to dispose of the above cRP by directing the Honble^principal Judge, Family court -cumAdditional Chief Judge, Hyderabad, to convert the Op No.19B of 2015 fited by the petitioner for grant of decree of divorce into the one filed for grant of consent decree under Section 138 oF the HM Act

¶34

IA NO: 2 OF 2019

¶35

Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to grant stay of operation of the common order dated 11-12-2018 in I.A. No. 1769 oi 20tg in o.P.No. 198 of 2015 on the file of the learned principal Judge, Family Court-cumAdditional Chief Judge, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the CRp.

¶36

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI H VENUGOPAL

¶37

Counsel for the Respondent: SRI M VIJAYA KANTH

¶38

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶39

¶40

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHtr,ARA sIo N REDDY COMMON ORDER: TION Nos.1 453 andt 48Oot2 19

¶41

Heard learned cor ut""'for the petitioner and respondent. 2. It is rsplsssnr.o by learned counsel on both sides that the parties have settled the matter outside the Court and agreed to file application under Section 13_B of the Hindu Marriage Act, tg5s (for short ,,the Act,,) and requested to vacate the interim stay granted earlier in CRp.No.14S3 of 2019.

¶42

Accordingly, Civil Revision petitions are dismissed as u,itl'rdrawn and stav granted earUer is vacated. Learned Judge, Farrily Court may consider for expeditious disposal of appiication filed under Section 13_B ol the Act, as and when it is filed. in accordance with iaw. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand clo S

¶43

SD/-M.MAN]ULA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE^COPY I I Gb \ SECTION OFFICER

¶44

To,

¶45

The Principal Judge, Family Court^{-cum- AdditionalChiefJudge,Hyderabad} 2. One CC to SRI H VENUGOPAL^Advocate [OPUC]

¶46

One CC to SRI.^M VIJAYA^{KANTHAdvocate} IOPUC]

¶47

Two CD Copies

¶48

One Spare Copy TR

¶49

HIGH^COURT

¶50

DATED:08/^{12l 2021}

¶51

ORDER inp,no.r+sa^{AND 1480 of 2019}

¶52

1r-lE St4
I
(:
3 J 10 DEC202I
ICi
t ?
D;1Ta!1i-
--l:-::--

¶53

DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS WITHDRAWN
I
/)-,/
<br>

Ajay Reddy Vongala v. Harika Reddy Tula

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Reddy Vongala v. Harika Reddy Tula

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kanne Anjaiah Vs Sama Amruthamma

Vallambhatla Poornachandra Rao Vs Smt.Thorpunuri Laxmi Narsamma,Laxmamma

Smt Bejagam Swathi, Vs Kanukuntla Kommalu

Smt.Bongoni Sirisha Vs Bongoni Praveen Kumar

Ajay Reddy Vongala Vs Harika Reddy Tula

Devineni Jayaram Prasad Vs Devineni Subba Rao (Died) and 3 Others