Court permitted withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 5027 of 2020 after representation by counsel and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Permission accorded; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.5027 OF 2020
ORDER :
Sri P. Venkanna, learned counsel for the petitioners - accused No.1, 2 and 3, under the instructions of the petitioners, addressed a letter dated 10.11.2020 to the Registry seeking withdrawal of the writ petition, as such, the matter is listed today under the caption ‘for withdrawal.
caption ‘for withdrawal’, learned counsel for the petitioners reiterated
his submission.
The aforesaid letter dated 10.11.2020 addressed by the learned counsel for the petitioners to the Registry shall form part of the record.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed.
_________________ K. LAKSHMAN, J
November 17, 2020.
PV
PETITIONERS
RESPONDENT
K. LAKSHMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
