The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging alleged inaction by authorities regarding unregistered complaints of a cognizable crime, noting that a private complaint had already resulted in registration of a criminal case, and sustained satisfaction with the respondents' explanation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
H|GH couRrt?T ITB:ItliSF TEL,ANGANA
(SPeciatOriginal Jurisdictlon)
TL.II IPqNAY THE TWELFTHDAY OF NOVEIVBER """-1wo rHousAND AND TWENTY
Ps[i,t5$icE P' NAVEENRAo rHE HoNouR^".t
WRITP ETITIONNO: 30937 0F 2013
Between:
Smt SelamVenkatramanaW/oAnamchinni VenkaleshwarRaoAqed about 34 years occ Housewife. R/o. rrri'ili^i05,"'sntit1"S'tfair Apts H No l2-5-15'near i.,r?riir.,i,i,"ifrJJilyHouse,ViiiVrpriitotony,Tarnaka,Secunderabad ...pETlTlONER
...pETlTlONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 oflhe constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filedtherewith,the High court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction moreparticuarllyone in the nature of writ of It4andamus by declaring the action of the respondents in not looking lntothe complaint dated: 09-10-2013 and dated: 11-10-2013 and refused to take complaint as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of naturaljustice and consequently direct the respondents No.1 to 3 to take neecessary action by enquiring of the grievance of the petitioner and do justice
WPMP. NO:38413 OF 20't3
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.'1 to 3 to take appropriate action on the complaint .d1.09.10.2013 and dt.11.10.2013 Iodged by petitioner, pending disposal of the writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. pASHAM KRISHNA REDDy
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Gp FOR PROHIBIT|ON AND EXCTSE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 : Gp FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : --
The Court made the following: ORDER
-2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAb
T PETITIO NNo.30937 of2ol3
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed alleging that even though a cognizable crime was reported by the petitioner so far the crime ls not registered.
SD/.B.SATYAV HI ASSISTANT REG RAR
,TRUE COPY'
SECTION OFFICER
KI
\OX
HIGH COURT
DATED:12 t11t2L2o
l
ir iHE S l4
o
,)o
20 N}u 2w0
o
\ )o -}-
..--
ORDER
WP.No.3093T of 2013
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS.
nVo -,!t,)'
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt Selam Venkatramana
The Excise and Prohibition Department
The State of A.P.
Police Station, Khammam Town
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
