Dismissed

M/s. Konstruct Reality India Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Telangana and 6 others

Telangana HC12 Nov 2020WP/13479/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought a writ mandamus under Article 226 directing Police respondents to register an FIR, citing Lalitha Kumari, while also moving under Section 151 CPC. The Court accepted counsel's submission that a crime was registered post-filing, finding the writ cause no longer survived and dismissed the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

No FIR registration directed; petition dismissed as crime registered.

M/s. Konstruct Reality India Pvt. Ltd. Vs State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR AT HYDERABAD THE STATE OF TELANGANA^''--"-''

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

¶6

Between:

¶7

WRIT P ETITI ON NO: 13479 oF2 20

¶8

1 Ivl/s Konstruct Rearrtv rndia pvt. Ltd, s-'1-191, shop No.301, Brundavan comprex, Hyderabad - its Authorised nejpieseniiti""I's"rL'l[u;v;; p,.;#j,'J;'g''#modar, Ased 3333ilr?::;iv 2 Rajesh Goel. S/o. Leeradhar Goel, Aged about 44 years, Rio. J204, Giridhari Executive park, Near Khati Mandir,^{peerancheruvu,} nloerJt rfir,oie,'fioij.tio"-'ioto"g'i'."""" ']l=_,r,or.

¶9

AND

¶10

State of relangana, Rep. by its principal secretary, Home Department, secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶11

The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad.

¶12

The Station House Office, P.S. Gachibowli, Cyberabad.

¶13

4 Mr Naveen Red_dy, S_ub-lnspeclor, P.S. Gachibowli, Cyberabad.

¶14

J. Sridhar Rao, R/o, Gumm{ji Prestige Villa- 13, Gundlapochampally Viilage, Matkajgiri

¶15

[/andal, Medchal Malkajgiri District.

¶16

IM. Sirisha, W/o. J. Sridhar Rao, R/o, Gummadi Prestige Villa - 13, Gundlapochampally Vitlage, lValkajgiri Mandal, lVedchal Malkajgiri District,

¶17

Anjaneya Raju, R/o. 2-22-1-16-404, Flat No.404, Alluri Residential Complex, Bhagyanagar Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad - 500072.

¶18

...REspoNDENrs

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be^pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ. Order or Orders, Direction or Directions^{to declare the action of the} 3rd and 4th respondents in taking action on^{the complaintsfiled by the 1st petitioneron} 05.03.2020 and 06.03.2020 against the^{respondents5 to 7 herein, notwithstandingthe orders of} the Hon' ble Court dated 06.08.2020^{in W.P.No.10539of 2020 and communicatingthe notice} dated 19.03.2020 to the 1st^{petitioneron 13.08.2020,as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the law} laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme^{Court and to issue a consequentialdirection to act in} accordance with law and to^{registerFIR againstthe respondents 5,6 and 7 basingon the} complaints filed by^{the petitioner on 05.03.2020and06.03.2020by following the.iudgementin} the case of Lalitha^{Kumari reported in 2014(2) SCC Pg'1}

¶20

IAN :1OF2²⁰

¶21

Petition under Section^{151CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit} filed in support^{of the petition, the High courtmay be pleasedto direct the 3rd respondentto} register FIR against^{the respondents5,6 and 7 basing on the complaintsfiled by the 1"t} petitioneron05.03.2020and06.03.2020byfollowingthejudgementinthecaseofLalitha Kumari reporte^{d in 2014 (2) SCC Pg"t} '^{pending disposalof the WritPetition}

¶22

Counsel^{for the Petitioners:SRI VEDULA SRINIVAS}

¶23

Counsel^{for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME}

¶24

Counsel for^{Respondent Nos'4 to 7: '---}

¶25

The Court made^{the following:ORDER}

¶26

¶27

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{P.NAVEEN RAO}

¶28

WRIT oN NO.13479 0F 2020

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after fi1ing of the writ petition, crime is registered. Therefore, the cause in the writ petition does not survive.

¶31

Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶32

EKHAR^RAOI SD/.N.CHANDRA^S i ASSISTANT^REG

//TRUE^COPY//

SECTION^OFFICER

To 1.2. One Two CC CCs to to Sri^{GP Vedula Srinivas Advocate for nome' rtiin E"'i t"'itt" tOPU^ClSta'te of Telangana (OUT)} 3. Two CD CoPies

IVBC

-L'/A{V

HIGH COURT

DATED:^1211112020

1 r-tE s 14 r4:
( o-
<br>o 2 0 No'/ 2020
\ ,.
Y!+* * -{
DF.S

¶42

ORDER

¶43

WP.No.13479 of 2020

¶44

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION

¶45

WITHOUT COSTS

¶46

t
ta\ rt>o
*{k

M/s. Konstruct Reality India Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Telangana and 6 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Konstruct Reality India Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Telangana and 6 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaik. Sayeed Bin Hasan Ali Amoodi Vs The State of Telangana

Shaik Shadik Pasha Vs The State of Telangana And 4 Others

Dr. Raj Kumar Vemula and Another Vs The State of Telangana and 4 Others

Smt Selam Venkatramana, Vs The Excise and Prohibition Department

Mystic Hills Owners Association, Vs The State of Telangana

N. Srinivas Yadav Vs The State of Telangana