Writ petition under Article 226 regarding arbitrary police inaction in registration of an FIR was dismissed as the petitioners conceded the cause no longer existed after the crime was already registered.
None; writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original J urisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEI,4BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 13740 OF 2020
Between:
N. Srinivas Yadav, Sio, Late N. Laxmaiah, Aged about 57 years, Om Business, R/o. H. No. 1-66/3, Hydershakote Village, Now Gandipet [/andal, Ceyberabad, Telangana - 5oo 081
...PETrroNER
AND
...REspoNDENrs
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a direction or order more parlicularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not taking further action by issuing following procedure U/s 154 Cr.P.C on the basis of the complaint of the petitioner daled 14-O7-2020 in relation to 100 Sq.Yards of land in Sy.No.31 and 28 of Hydershah Kote Village, Rajendranagar l,4andal, Ranga Reddy District as being arbitrary, illegal and violates Article 14, 19(1) (g), 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent no.3 to start investigation after issuing an FIR against the respondent no.4 in terms of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in AIR 2014 SC 187
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Seclion 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no 3 not to interfere in civil disputes relation to 100 Sq.Yards of larrd in Sy.No.31 and 28 of Hydershah Kote Village, Rajendranagar lVlandal, Ranga' Reddy District
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VIJAY B PAROPAKARI
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for Respondent No. 4: ----
The Court made the following: ORDER
-2-
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
IVRIT PETITION No.1374O of 2O2O
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the crime was already registered, the cause in thc writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the rvrit petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed. Mrscelianeous petitions, iI-any pending, stand closed.
SD/-V.SUDHA ASSISTANTREGI AR ,TRUECOPY'
SEC N OFFICER
'"' 1 ff B 33 Jii3 J Isl,5"',T:fi ilf t 3sx?3?1fi ioJ#3r"''" I a ng an a( o U r ) 3. TwoCD CoPies f,18C ct-
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1211112020
1HE S 14
o
k
e o(
o
I 19 NC'/2m0 z
<br>i'+* * 3'
PprcH
ORDER
WP.No.13740of 2020
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION AS
INFRUCTUOUS,WITHOUT COSTS
e N
\P
Ya
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives adjudication after the cause of action has ceased due to registration of the crime.
N. Srinivas Yadav
The State of Telangana
The Superintendent of Police, Cyberabad
The Station House Officer, P.S. Narsingi
P. Salraj
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
