The High Court dismissed a civil revision petition under Article 227 as infructuous because the main suit being challenged was already disposed of by the lower court on 17.08.2015, leaving nothing for adjudication.
The Civil Revision petition and CRP are dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF IVARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3856 OF 2013
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated 2310812013 passed in lA No.929/20'13 in OS No.143712013 on the file of the court of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Rang Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.
Between:
...REVrsroNpETrroNERS/pETrroNERS/pLATNTTFFS
AND
CRPMP. NO: 5178 OF 2013
Petition under order 39 Rule1 & 2 R/w. Section 151 CPC praying thatin the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiled in supportof the petition,the Highcourt may bepleased togrant Ad-interim lnjunctioninlA.No,929/2013 in OS.No.143712013 on the fileof 1't Additional Senior Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar pending hearing of themainCRP.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRIA.L.RAJU
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2'l ,22 & 23 : SRI V.VENKATAMAYUR
The Court made the following: ORDER
I '
THE HON'BLE DR. JUS'ITCE SHAMEEM AKTHE R t PE T
ORDER;
No representation For both sides.
The case status placed by the Registry before this Court reveals that the subject suit in O.S.N o.7437 of 2013 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, was disposed of on 17.08.2015. Therefore, noth ing su rvives for adjudication in th is revision petition, which is filed challenging the interrocutory order passed in the said suit.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed.
SdIB.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUECOPY' { SECTION OFFICER
*).
HIGHCOURT
DATED:03/03/2020
<br>r.\ E OF
b'
.o tr&<br>llr.
F t L&
€ c- ,s
\s
...9.
,(Y
ti ?/2
-t7
ORDER
CRP.No.3856 of2013
DISMISSING THE CRP.AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
Ar"
A$y
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil revision petition challenging an interlocutory order should be allowed when the main suit has already been disposed of.
Smt N.Sridevi
N.Phani Krishna
Sri lV.Ranjith Kumar
Dr. Justice Shameem Akther
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
