Disposed

Ch.Ramakrishna Reddy v. Chinthireddy Sampath ,Sampath Reddy

Telangana HC2 Mar 2020CRP/413/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a civil revision petition filed against the dismissal of an application for appointing a government officer to demarcate land. The court observed that since parties agreed to measure the disputed land in a different suit via an advocate commissioner, there was no necessity to appoint a government officer in the current suit.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition was disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions stood closed.

Ch.Ramakrishna Reddy Vs Chinthireddy Sampath ,Sampath… — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

THE HON’BLE Dr . JUSTI CE SHAMEEM AKTHER

¶2

Civil Revision Pet it ion No.4 1 3 of 2 0 1 9

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the revision petitioner/ defendant No.1, challenging the order, dated 26.11.2018, passed in I.A.No.459 of 2018 in I.A.No.1196 of 2017 in O.S.No.223 of 2017 by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Huzurabad, whereby, the subject interlocutory application filed by the revision petitioner/ defendant No.1 along with other defendants requesting the Court below to appoint the Assistant Director, Land Survey and Settlement, Karimnagar, to demarcate the entire Survey No.74 and its bits, including the suit schedule property, situated at Arkandla village shivar, Shankarapatnam Mandal of Karimnagar District, was dismissed.

¶5

2 . Heard the learned counsel for both the sides and perused the record.

¶6

3 . In the course of submissions, the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 herein/ plaintiff submitted that the respondent No.1 herein/ plaintiff has no objection to measure the land belonging to the revision petitioner/ defendant No.1 in another suit in O.S.No.160 of 2010 on the file of the Court below filed by the revision petitioner/ defendant No.1 and others. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner/ defendant No.1 had fairly conceded to the same and submitted that the revision petitioner herein/ defendant No.1 intends to file an application for

¶7

¶8

appointment of advocate commissioner to record the physical features of the suit schedule land in O.S.No.160 of 2010 on the file of the Court below. As far as measuring the suit land in the subject O.S.No.223 of 2017 on the file of the Court below is concerned, since both the parties are claiming land in Survey No.74 situated at Arkandla village shivar, Shankarapatnam Mandal of Karimnagar District, it is not necessary to appoint an advocate commissioner in the subject suit in O.S.No.223 of 2017 for determination of the issues therein.

¶9

4 . With the above observation, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶10

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this CRP, shall stand closed. ______________________ Dr . SHAMEEM AKTHER, J 02^nd March, 2020 Bvv

Ch.Ramakrishna Reddy v. Chinthireddy Sampath ,Sampath Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ch.Ramakrishna Reddy v. Chinthireddy Sampath ,Sampath Reddy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.v.Shankar Vs M.Hari

Gandham Gopal Vs Cheviti Venkanna

Gopishetty , Gunda Anusha Vs Gopishetty Poorna Chander

V.Ch.Nata Raju Vs Karimnagar Vipanchi Chit Funds Private Limited

Emmar Mgf Land Ltd., Vs Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd.

Thalakoppula Sam Williams Vs Dubba Ashok Sunder