Disposed

K. Bhaskar Rao, and 3 Others, v. a. Subba Rao, and 2 Others

Telangana HC3 Mar 2020CRP/2783/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble High Court for Telangana, via a judicial officer and legal services committee, disposed of civil revision petitions under Article 227 and stayed petitions under Section 151 CPC by recording a compromise arrived at in Lok Adalat after parties settled underlying suits regarding agricultural land properties.

What did the court decide?

The civil revision petitions were disposed of; the stay of operation on the decrees was lifted in terms of the Lok Adalat award; the underlying suits were disposed of as setnled.

K. Bhaskar Rao, and 3 Others, Vs a. Subba… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE^{STATEOF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD}

¶2

TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY^{OF MARCH} TWO THOUSAND AND TWNNTY

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOTIRABLE DT. fUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

¶5

CN'IL RE\TSION PETITION Nos: 2602. 2598 and 2783^o f²⁰¹²

¶6

CRP No.2602 of 2012

¶7

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to revise the order dated 20.01.2012 passed in CMA No.44 of 2007 on the file of the court of the III Additional District and Sessions ludge (FTC) at Medak, preferred against the order dated 26. 07 .2007 made in I.A No. 346 of 2007 in O.S No. 109 of 1991 on the file of the court of the Junior Civil Judge, Narsapur.

¶8

Between:

¶9

K. Bhaskar rao, S/o late K.Venkatesham, @ K.Venkateshwar Rao, Occ: Business

¶10

K.SudhakarRao, DIED, byLR, -

¶11

K.Madhukar Rao, s/o Iate K.Venkatesham, @ K.Venkateshwar Rao, occ: Business

¶12

K.Ashalatha, w/o iate K.Sudhakar Rao, LR of Petitioner No.? Petitioner-4 Petitioners 1 to 3 are r/o H.No.1-7-208, Bakaram, Hyderabad. Petitioner No.4 is r/o H.No.1-7-507l8, Zamisthanpur, Bakaram, Hyderabad.

¶13

...Petitioners

¶14

AND

¶15

A. Sathyanaryana, S/o Ranga Rao, occ: Agrl r/o 101, Bhaskara Enclave, 1085, Nagarjuna Nagar, Yellareddyguda, Hyderabad 5000073.

¶16

K.Venkateshwar Rao, @ Venkatesham DIED by LR ..Defendant No.2/Xespondent-2

¶17

K.Padmavathi, do late K.Venkatesham @ K.Venkateshwar Rao, aged Occ: Housewife, r/o H.No. 1-7-50718, Zamisthanpur, Bakaram, Hyderabad

¶18

LR of 2"d Defendant/Respondent No.3

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit frled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise arrived between the petitioners and respondents and pass order/decree in terms of Memorandum of Compromised dated 28-12-2019.

¶22

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(CRPMP. NO: 3464 OF 2012)

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit frled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to sray the operation of the order and decree dt. 20.1.2012 in C.M.A.No.44 of 2007 on the file of the coun ofthe III AddI District 86 Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) at Medak.

¶24

,-L

¶25

C L R-EVISI P N No: 25 f I

¶26

Petition under Article 227 of the Consritution of India, to revise the order dated 20.01.2012 CMA No.43 of 2007 on the file of the court of the Ill\dd:tional District and Sessoins Judge (FTC) at Medak, preferred against the order dated 25. 0'7.2007 made in LA No. 348 of 2006 in O.S No. 111 of 1991 on rhe file of the courr of the ]unior Civil )udge, Narsapur.

¶27

Berween:

¶28

K. Bhaskar Rao , S/o late K.Venkatesham, @ K.Venkateshwar Rao, Occ: Business

¶29

K.Sudhakar Rao, DIED, by LR, -

¶30

K.Madhukar Rao, s/o iate K.Venkatesham, @ K.Venkateshw,rr R;ro, occ: Business

¶31

K.Ashalatha, w,'o late K.Sudhakar Rao, LR of Petitioner No.2/ Petitioner-4 Petitioners 1 to ll are r/o H.No.1-7-208, Bakaram, Hyderabal. Petitioner No.4 is r/o H.No.1-7-50718, Zamisthanpur, Bakaram, Hyderabad.

¶32

...Petitioners

¶33

A\ID

¶34

A.Satti Raju Siva Kumar, S/o V.S.R.Sunder Rao occ: Agrl r/o Plot l..los 12 and 13, Padmaja Colony,Tarhund, Secunderabad

¶35

Petitioner(Ist Defendant)/A :pel lant/Petitioner

¶36

K.Venkateshwar Rao. @ Venlatesham DIED by LR ..Defendant l{o.2Respondent-2

¶37

K.Padmalathi, w/o late K.Venkatesham @ K.Venkateshwar Rao, agec. Occ: Housewife, r/o H.No. I -7-50718, Zamisthanpur, Bakaram, Hyderabad

¶38

i. LR of2'd Defendant/Res rondent No.3

¶39

...RXSPONDENTS

¶40

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶41

Petition under Order 23 Rule of CPC praying that in the circurnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be rlea;ed to record the compromise arrived between the petitioners and respondents and pass order/decree in terms of memorandum of⁽ ompromise dated 28-12-2019.

¶42

N 1 0F 2012 CRPvIP NO: 3456 oF 2012)

¶43

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circurr^starLces stated^{in the} affidavit filed in suppon of the petition, the High Coun^{may be pleaseds,tay the operation} of the order and decree daLed 20-1-2012 in CMA.NO.^{43 of 2007on the file of the Court} of the II Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge, [FTC] at^Medak.

¶44

)

¶45

CI\TL REVISION PETITION NO:2783 OF 2012

¶46

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to revise the order dated 20.01.2012 CMA No.45 of 2007 on the file of the court of the IIi Additional District and Sessoins Judge (mC) at Medak, preferred against the order dated 26.07.2007 made in I.A No. 347 of 2006 in O.S No. ll0 of 1991 on the file of the coun of the funior Civil ludge, Narsapur.

¶47

Between:

¶48

K. BHASKAR RAO, & 3 OTHERS,, S/o Late K.Venkatesham, @ K.Venlateshwar Rao, Occ: Business, R/o H.No.1-7-208, Bakaram, Hyderabad.

¶49

2, K.Sudhakar Rao,, DIED by LR.,

¶50

K.Madhukar Rao,, S/o l,ate K.Ven}atesham, @ K.Venkateshwar Rao, Occ: Business, R/o H.No. I -7-208, Bakaram, Hyderabad.

¶51

K.Ashalatha,, Wo Late K.Sudhakar Rao, Occ: Business, R/o H.No.1-7-50718, Zamisthanpur, Bakaram, Hyderabad.

¶52

...PETITIONER(S)

¶53

AND

¶54

A.Subba Rao, S/o late Satyanarayana occ: Agrl r/o Plot No2, Panchavati Colony Tarbund, Secunderabad

¶55

Petitioner(Ist Defendant)/Appellant/Petitioner

¶56

K.Venkateshwar Rao, @ Venlatesham DIED by LR ..Defendant No.2/Respondent-2

¶57

K.Padmarathi, o late K.Venkatesham @ K.Venkateshwar Rao, aged Occ: Housewife, r/o H.No.1-7-507l8, Zamisthanpur, Bakaram, Hyderabad

¶58

LR of 2.d Defendant/Respondent No.3

¶59

...RESPONDENTS

¶60

IA NO: I OF 2020

¶61

Petition under Order 23 Rule of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise arrived between the petitioners and respondents and pass order/decree in terms of memorandum of Compromise dated 28 -12-2019.

¶62

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(CRPMP. NO: 3697 OF 2012)

¶63

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppon of the petition, the High Coun may be pleased to stay the operation of the order and decree dt.20-01-2012 in CMA No.45 of 2007 ot the file of the Court of the III Additional Dist. & Sessions Judge, (FIC) at Medak.

¶64

Coursel for the Petitioners in all CRPs Sri Venkatesh Deshpande

¶65

Coursel for the respondent No.l in all CRPs Sri Venkata Ranga Das Kanuri

¶66

The Court made the following:-

¶67

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

CIVI 1598

AND 2783 0F 2012

COMMON ORDER:

Hea rd. Perused the record.

¶73

Vide order, dated 05.02.2020, the civil revision^pet.itions were referred to Lol.l Adalat. On 08.02.2020, the matters were settled before the Lok Adalat and an Award was^passed by the Lok Adalat. In view of the same, the civil revision petitions are lisp,osed of, in terms oF the Awa.d, dated 08.02.2020,^passed by tre -ok Adalat. There shall be no rrder as to costs.

¶74

The Registrv is directed to annex a copy of the Avrard to this

¶75

order.

¶76

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any,^pending in this appeal shall

¶77

sta nd closed .

¶78

SD/-T.RANGA^BABU ASSISI' REGlSTRAR /iTRUE^COPY// SECTi OFFICER

¶79

To,

¶80

The lll Additional.^{l)istrictSessionsJudge,(FastTrack Court) Medal<}

¶81

The iunior^Civil iudge,^{Narsapur,Medak District'}

¶82

One CC to^{Sri Venkatesh DespandeAdvocate IOUPC]}

¶83

One CC to^{Sri Venkat Ranga Das Kanuri Advocate IOUPC]}

¶84

Two^{CD CoPies}

HIGH COURT

Dated 03.03.2020

COMMONORDER

CRP Nos. 260Q2598 and 2783 of 201.2

¶90

7l 't H 'rAI4,
t\,
) fi,'tr 'l
23ltN 2r[0 ^l
Ai/
*^+/l
r..)

¶91

Disposing of CRPs in terms of Lok Adalat Award without costs

¶92

oI
q wlp

¶93

¶94

'Birf OilE iil t' LffK ADALAT

¶95

HELD AT HYDERABAD

¶96

[Orgonized^{by High Courl Legol ServicesCommitlee} High Court For the Slole of Telongono

¶97

UnderSeciion l9 of iheLegol Services Authorities Act.^{1987(CenlrolAct)l} CRP.Nos.2 598, 2602 ond 2783 ot 2012

¶98

(Before the Hon'ble High Court)

¶99

(Agoinst the Orders possed in CMA N os. 43, 44 ond 45 ol 2007 doted 20.01 .2012 on lhe file of the lll Additionol Dislrict & Sessions Judge^(Fost Trock Court) ot Medok)

¶100

Petilioners	K.Bhoskor Roo
	Andothers.
Respondenls	A. SottiRoju SivoKumor Andothers.

¶101

[No.^{of proceedingsof the High CcurtLegolServices} Commiitee: O R D ER ROC. N o.232 / HCLSC I 2020. Do ted 0 6-02-2020)

¶102

:: Present ::

¶103

Nome of Choirmon

¶104

: Han'ble Sri Justice G.V.Seethopothy, Judge. High Court of Andhro Prodesh (Retired)

¶105

Nome of Members

¶106

ti l,/i
il0il (;oilRl I
(j r,; Li)A r-AT I
,]

¶107

: (1) Dr. K.Sotyo noroyo no Roo, Advocote, High Courl for the Stote of Telongono .

¶108

(2) Sri K.Venkntg Sirnhodri, Advocote High Courl for the Stote of Telongono/ Sociol Woriler.

¶109

AWARD

¶110

The dispute between the porties hoving been refened for delerminotion to the LOK ADALAT qnd the porties hoving compromised the cose / motter, the following Common Aword is possed in lerms of the seltlemenl:

¶111

L The revision petitioners/plointif f s ore present olong wiih their Counsel Mr. G. Joyendro Boloji. The respondents/def endonts ore present olong with their Counsel Mr. Venkoto Rongodos (onuri.

¶112

The firsi respondent in C.R.p.No.27B3 of 2012 - Sri A. Subbo Roo, is represenied by his doughier - Smt. Usho Roni, through ihe Generol Power of Atiorney, doted^j9.12.2019. The originol Generol power of Attorney is produced olong wilh the ottested copy thereof ond ofler perusol, ihe originol is relurned to the porties.

l,s Qryr-

Chairman/Member

Both porties in the three mollers hove stoted lhot trey hove omicobly resolved their disputes reloting to the subject motler of the three suits i.e., O.S.Nos.l09, I l0 ond lll of 1991 on the file oi lhe leorned Junior Civil Judge, Norsopur, i.e., Acs.5.00 of lond situoted ot Anonlhorom Villoge, Jinnorqm Mondol in Medok Districl, ond entered into o compromise in respect thereof duly setting cu1 the terms of compromise.

¶118

They hove filed opplicolions under Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC in l.A.No.l of 2020 in eoch motter enclosing the Memorondum of Comp'om se.

¶119

StRVIC
a
,lfi:,':'.jxs, i

¶120

. The terms of compromise ore reod over ond exploinecl to boih^poriies in their vernoculor ond they odmitted them to be true ond correct.

¶121

Accordingly, the compromise is recorded os^{per -he} terms set oul in the Memorondum of Compromise filed in eoch mrrtter ond Common Aword is^{possed pursuonl} to the compromise os^per the terms set out therein.

¶122

The opplicolions in oll the motters, being l.A.Nos.l of 2A20, os olso the Memorondum of Compromise sholl be onnexed to on,J sholl form^porl of the Aword.

¶123

ln view of the compromise ond the Aword^{possetl, os stoted obove,} the C.R.P.Nos.2598, 2602 ond 2783 of 2012 stond disposed of^os compromised. Consequently.^{the suits, being O.S.Nos.109, l l0 ond} I 1 I of 1 991 on the file of ihe leorned Junior Civil^{Ju Jge,,Norsopur,olso} stond disposed of os settled ond^{compromisedbelore the Lok Adolot.}

¶124

Since the subjecl motter of^{the three suits is the someqnd the porties} ore olso virtuolly ihe some, the Common^{Aword is beingpossedin ihe} lhree motters.

¶125

l0.The motler moy be^ploced before the High Court 'or^{possingthe finol} orders regording the disposol.

*th.,

l,; fi0*

Chairman/Member

I I.The poriies ore informed thot^{the court fee, if ony,poidby ony of them}

¶131

sholl be refunded.

¶132

r/)
l/
V,4 h-e't'*/.'
/ ) ..\ /( .---
-
Pelitioner No.l in c.R.P.Nos.2598, Respondent No.l in C.R.P.No.2598
I 2602 ond 2783 ol 2012 ot 2012
i\ :,.. t _," 1..r r 1-.(- -
I A,t', L,,.(.,- <br>Respondenl No.l in C.R.P.No.2602
Pelilioner No.2 in C. R. P. Nos.2598, ol 2012
2602 ond 2783 ol 20'12
) 1l
1t . t-^-. ,.- - l,''.-" '' f"'- ' '. r/r h/rh/1 t.ll(t tt t
Respondenl No.'l in C.R.P.N0.2783
Pelilioner No.3 in C.R.P.Nos.2598, ol 2012
2602 ond 2783 ol 2012
K' k-L.,)''o^'-'
k. \k,N,.-, fi-r\tvl
Pelilioner No.4 in C.R,P.Nos.2598,
Respondenl No.2 in C.R,P.Nos.2598,
2602 ond 2783 ol 2012
2602 ond 2793 ot 2012
a \ ,f^"""'n VnfufJ
I Respondenl No.3 in C.R,P.Nos.2598,
2602 ond 2783 ol 2012
e . . 0r r (
l+\ G,'i R'0.'4t
i::t .,'/-
--()
counsel for peliliondf "''''i Coun sel for respondenls

¶133

t l^
/ [ -a- h^ .(
u---r'- (!!--_
Choirmon Member Member
(, d. 9r. fiV/(:
Doie: 08.02.2020
llRl
ir
L.AT
ol of the mmittee)
;'1' t

¶134

Cha irma 'r/Member

K. Bhaskar Rao, and 3 Others, v. a. Subba Rao, and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. Bhaskar Rao, and 3 Others, v. a. Subba Rao, and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ch.Ramakrishna Reddy Vs Chinthireddy Sampath ,Sampath Reddy

V.Ch.Nata Raju Vs Karimnagar Vipanchi Chit Funds Private Limited

Emmar Mgf Land Ltd., Vs Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd.

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Hyd Vs a. Shiva Krishna , Secunderabad and 2 Others

Smt N.Sridevi and Another Vs Sri M.Ranjith Kumar and 22 Others

K.Bhaskar Rao and 3 Others Vs a. Satti Raju Siva Kumar and 2 Others