Allowed

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Hyd v. a. Shiva Krishna , Secunderabad and 2 Others

Telangana HC3 Mar 2020CMA/533/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Held an appeal under the Workmen's Compensation Act pending before the High Court was disposed of because the matter had already been settled and decided by a Lok Adalat constituted under the Legal Services Authorities Act via an award passed in February 2020.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is disposed of in terms of the Lok Adalat Award dated 08.02.2020. No order as to costs.

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Hyd… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

TUESDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF IVARCH

¶3

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

¶6

C.M.A. NO: 533 OF 2017

¶7

Appeal under Section 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act, against the order in WC No. 110 of 2012 dated 8/03/201 7 on the file of the Court of the Commissioner for Employees Compensation and Deputy Commisstoner of Labour-|, T. Anjaiah Karmika Samkshema Bhavanam, RTC Cross Roads, Hyderabad.

¶8

Between:

¶9

The Oriental lnsurance Company Ltd., Rep by its Manager, Regional Office, T.P. Claims, H.U.B.Snehalata Buildings, Begumpet, Hyderabad.

¶10

...APPELLANT/OPPOSITE PARTY NO. 3

¶11

AND

¶12

A. Shiva Krishna , S/o. Nagaraju, Occ: ex-driver, R/o. 1-64-365/A, Balkampet, S. R.Nagar, Secunderabad.

¶13

. RESPONDENT/APPLICANT

¶14

Vidugutla Shiva Prasad, S/o. not known to the claimaint, Aged: Major, Occ: Secund Owner and insured of car, Rt/o. 7-1-71IC, Ameerpet, Hydeiabad.

¶15

..,RESPONDENT/OPPOSITE PARTY NO. 1

¶16

Ramulu Sir, S/o, Bala Narsimha Aged: Ir/ajor, Occ: Owner of car, R/o. H.No. 8-32281643, Yousufguda, Ameerpet, Hyderabad.

¶17

...RESPONDENT/OPPOSITE PARTY NO. 2

¶18

CMAMP. NO: 885 OF 2017

¶19

Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affldavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including the execution of the order passed in W.C.No. 110 of 2012 dated 08.03.2017 on the file of the commissioner for Employee Compensation and by commissioner of Labour-l At Hyderabad.

¶20

Counsel for the Appellant:SRl. B L PRASUNA

¶21

Counsel forthe Respondents:SRl. JAGATHPAL REDDY KASI REDDY

¶22

The Court delivered the following:

¶23

THE HON'BLE^{DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER}

¶24

Civit Miscella^{neous Aoeal No.533 of} oL7

¶25

JUDGMENT:

¶26

Heard. Perused the^record'

¶27

Vide order, dated^{04'02.2020,the appealwas referredto} Lok Adalat. On 08.02.2020,^{the matter was settled beforethe} Lok Adalat and an^{Awardwas passedby the High CourtLegal} Services Committee,^{Hyderabad. This appeal is, accordingly,} disposed of in^{termsof the said Award dated0B'02'2020'}

¶28

The Registry is directed^{to annex a copy of the Awardto} this^judgment.

¶29

Miscellaneous Petitions,^{if any, pending in this appealshall}

¶30

stand closed.^{There shall be no order as to costs'}

¶31

Sd/. M. SHANTHI^VARDHANI JOINT REGIS R

¶32

//TRUE COPY'

¶33

SECTION OFFICER

¶34

To, 1. The Commissioner^{for Employees' Compensationand Deputy} " corm-i.ri.enr of Labour li, t.'lnlaiat Kirmika sankshema Bhavan, RTC Cross Roads,^{Hyderabad.(with records)}

¶35

One CC to^{Smt. B.L. Prasuna,Advocate (OPUC)}

¶36

5: o;; aa i;^{ail. JasathpalReddv KasiReildv,Advocate (oPUC)}

¶37

Two CD CoPies.

¶38

(AJW Lok Adalat Award^coPY)

HIGH COURT

DATED:03/03/2020

JUDGMENT

CMA.No.533 of 2017

t '( E L4
)
t
a ?*
s
t- o
Iri
s
do
I' (5
<br>J H I *

¶46

Disposing oICMA

¶47

Interms of Lok Adalat Award

)cr-o
1-

..r'

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

!:rt

HELD AT HYDERABAD

[Orgonized^{by High Court legol Services Commitlee} High Court for lhe Slote of Telongono

¶57

Under Seclion l9 of lhe Legol Services^{Aulhorities Act,'1987(CenlrolAcl)]}

¶58

CMA.No.533 o12017

¶59

(Belore lhe Hon'ble High Court)

¶60

(A-qoinstlheOrderinW.C.No.llOof20l Compensolion ondDepuly Commissionero RTCCross	2onthe file ollheCommissioner^{for Employees} lLobour-^l,T.Anioioh^{Kormiko SomkshemoBhovon,} Roods,Hyderobod
Appello nt	The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd.,Rep.by itsRegionaIManager,Snehalatha Apartments,Begumpet,Hyderabad
Respondenls i,:' Cr SERvt tt	A.ShivaKumar,S/o.Nagaraju Aged. 20years/Occ: Ex-Driver, R/o.H,No.1-64-365/A, Balkampet, S.R. NagarSecunderabad
2 t.irC!{^(;Ot.lRl' Lr)i:^/r'i.i/.i'AT	VidugutlaShivaPrasad,S/o.not knownto theapplicant,Age:Major. Secondownerandinsuredofcar, R/o. H.No.7-1-71lC,Ameerpet, Hyderabad
3	RamuluSir,S/o.Bala Narasimha, Age:Major, Occ: OwnerofCar, R/o. H.No.B-3-338/ 643,Yousufguda, meer et,Hyderabad
INo.^{ofproceedings of theHighCou} ORDERROC.No.232lHCLSC/2020.D ::	^{rlLegolServicesCommittee} oted06-02-20201 Presenl::
Nome of Choirmon :Hon Jud	'bleSriJuslice P.NoveenRoo, ge,High Court forlheStote ofTelongono
NomeofMembers :(l)	SriM.Sudorshon,Advocote, High Court forlheStote ofTelongono
(2)	SriP.RomNoroyonChetty,Advocole High Court forthe SloleofTelongono/ SociolWorker.

¶61

AWARD

¶62

The obove Cose between the porties hoving been referred for delerminotion to the LOK ADALAT ond the porlies hoving compromised tire cose / motter. the following Aword is possed in terms of the settlement:

¶63

t^.rg LrJe^x5

¶64

/:/^.._---n

¶65

Ch a rrm a n/ IY e m be r

¶66

¶67

The^{Appellont/TheOrientollnsuronce ComponyLinrilecl'} represenled^{by Smt NKolpono' Monoger of the oppellont'}

¶68

lr..

¶69

is Present

¶70

Respondent^{No' 1 /Workmonis presenl olong wi'th his courrsel} Ms.G.RenukorepresentingMr.K.JogothpolReddy,Advocote.-.

¶71

The^{Depuiy Commissioner of Lobour grontedcompensotion of} Rs.5,17,660/-^{with interest ctt 12% p'o' from the dole of petiliontill} reolizotion^{Aggrieved by the some' the insuroncecompony} preierred on^{oppeolviz' CMA'No 533 of 2017'}

¶72

After^{due deliberotlons'boih the portieshovesettled lhe motter} Oomicobly.^{The insuronce compony hos olreody depositedthe} entire^{omount oi compensotion os oworded by the Court below} The respondeni^{No l is reody to forego Rs 1'50'000/-only' Therefore'} lhe insuronce^{compony is entilledtor refund of Rs l'50'000/-only'}

¶73

ln'terms^{of the compromise onived ol between the poriies' this cose} is disPosed^of.

¶74

6 The porties ore informed thot the court fee' if ony' poid by ony of
lhem bef ore lower court sholl be ref unded'
j
r.r',.flri lll!r ance ComPanY Lifi:i'd /
r- ]tgr tiitFtt 'li.{'
f;ar '; . .,/
Ir.
Res ondenl No.'l
Appell ont/lns uronce ComPon
[,[-
Counsel for ReiPondenl No 'l
Counsel for APPello nl/lnsuronc e
ComPonY
/1 , l'."'\ ,!,".i\t',"'iil,,''.-. =-
'
W.5o.-.-): Mem ber
' Choirmon
Date:08-02'2020
ii ciii t, R]'
I L)oKfAir the l\L'-[ C il iee )

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Hyd v. a. Shiva Krishna , Secunderabad and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Hyd v. a. Shiva Krishna , Secunderabad and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ch.Ramakrishna Reddy Vs Chinthireddy Sampath ,Sampath Reddy

V.Ch.Nata Raju Vs Karimnagar Vipanchi Chit Funds Private Limited

Emmar Mgf Land Ltd., Vs Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd.

Smt N.Sridevi and Another Vs Sri M.Ranjith Kumar and 22 Others

K. Bhaskar Rao, and 3 Others, Vs a. Subba Rao, and 2 Others

K.Bhaskar Rao and 3 Others Vs a. Satti Raju Siva Kumar and 2 Others