Disposed
Ganghishetti Praveen v. Vandanapu Sunitha
Telangana HCCRP/244/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF IVARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 244 OF 2020
Petition under Article 227 o'f Conslitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order dated 10.01 .2020 in 1.A.No.489 of 2019 in O.P.No,42 o'f 2017 on the file of the Judge, Family Court - cum - Vl Additional District Judge, Nalgonda District.
Between:
Ganghishetti Praveen, S/o. Gangishetti Bixamaiah, Aged about 30 years, Occ. Software Engineer, R/o. H. No.3-18-218, Pragathinagar, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad, Presently Residing at Virglnia, USA, Rep., by its GPA and natural guardian Gangishetti Bixamaiah, S/o.G.Ramulu, Aged about 61 years, Occ.Retd. Professor, R/o. Ramanthapur, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
Vandanapu Sunitha, W/o. G. Praveen, Aged about 30 years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o. Canada, Rep. by her father V. Sathyanarayana, H.No.6-6-198/ 1, Ravindernagar, Nalgonda Town.
...RESPONDENT
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in OP.No.4212018 by suspending the impugned order dt.10.01 .2020 in lA.No.489 of 2019 in OP.No.42 of 2017 on the file of the Family Court - cum - Vl Additional District Judge, Nalgonda, pending disposal of the above Revision.
For the Petitioner: SMT. K. RAJITHA, ADVOCATE
For the Respondents: SRI G. SATYANARAYANA YADAV, ADVOCATE
The Court made the following ORDER:
THE I{ON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AI:TI-1 ER
CIVI L IIIEVISION PETITION No.244 OF 20:ll)
ORDER:
This revision, under Article 227 of the C )nstitution of India, is filerl bry the petitioner aggrieved by th( order dated 10.01.2020passed in I.A.No.4B9 of 2019 in O.P,l o.42. of 2017 by the Judge, Family Court-cum-VI Additional Iistrict Judge, Nalgonda, whereby the application filed by the GP,\ h,rlder, who is father of tre revision petitioner seeking permiss on to file the documents as well as positivephotographs in evidence by condoning the delay in filing the same, was dismiss:d.
2
The lvliscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand
closed. There shall be no order as to co StS.
CH.VENKATESWARULU ASSISTANT REGI
//TRUE COPY//
\
SECTION OFFICER
To,
\
HIGH COURT
DATED:04103i2020
,d6iE;,
k
?-^. <br>.., )
!* 1t
L 12 l{rr 20?0
C
.it
r! /
rcut!
-?;-'
ORDER
CRP.No.244ctf 2020
DISPOSINGOF THE CRP.
fui70t
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court