Allowed

Dandugala Ramesh v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC11 Nov 2020CRLP/4734/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Hyderabad allowed bail petitions filed by five accused persons (Accused Nos. 1 to 5) in a criminal case concerning Section 102 IPC. The court directed them to execute personal bonds with sureties based and to appear before the police officer regularly.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted; execution of personal bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties; appearance before SHO on every Sunday.

Dandugala Ramesh Vs The State of Telangana — Bail and Remand | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

I³¹⁶⁸ I

¶2

IN THd HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVE

¶4

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

¶5

:PRESEN1:

¶6

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶7

CRJMINAL PETITION NOS: 4734 & 4788 OF 2020

¶8

CRL.P. NO. 4134 0F 2020:

¶9

Between:

¶10

Dandugala Ramesh, S/o. Pedda Narsimha,

¶11

Dandugala Devender, S/o. Venkatesh,

¶12

Dandugala Ven.fatesh, S/o. Pedda Narsimha,

¶13

Petitioners/Accused No. 2 to 4

¶14

AND

¶15

The State ofTelangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad

¶16

/'-

¶17

Respondent/Complainant

¶18

Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioners/Accused No. 2 to 4 on bail in connection with Cr. No. 299 of 2020 of P.S. Choutuppal;

¶19

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4788 OF 2020

¶20

Betwecn:

¶21

Dandugala Yadagiri, S/o. Chinna Narsimha,

¶22

Petitioner/Accused No. I

¶23

AND

¶24

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

¶25

Respondent/Complainant

¶26

Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of CI.P.C, praying that in the circumstance<-stated in the petition and the grounds filed therein, the High Court may be^{pleasedto enlargethe} petitioners/Accused No. I on bail in connection with Cr. No. 299 of 2020 of P. S. Choutuppal;

¶27

These petitions coming on for hearing, upon^{perusingthe Petitions and the groundsfiled} therein, and upon hearing^{the arguments} of^{Sri M.A.Mujeeb,Advocateforthe petitioners in both} the petitions, and ofthe Public^{Prosecutor,forthe Respondentin both petitions,the Court made} the following.

¶28

THE H()NOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

¶29

CFIIMINAL PETITION No.4,T34 OF 2O2CI AND CIiIMINAL PETITION No.4788 OF 2020

¶30

COMMON ORDER:

¶31

Crl.P.No.1734 of 2O2O is filed by A2 to A4 and Crl.P.No.47B8 of 2O2O is filec by A I in Crime No.299 of 2O2O of Choutuppal Police Station. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections llO2, 34 1 read with 34 IPC.

¶32

Heard learne d counsei for the petitioners anti learned Public Prosecutcr. Perused the record.

¶33

Learnecl counsel for the petitioners would submit thar the petitioners are irr jail for more than 90 days.

¶34

All the petitioners were arrested on 10.08.2020 and since then they are in .iail.

¶35

On instructions, learned Public Prosecutor would submit that the police lrave almost completed investigation and recorded the statements c f material witnesses, charge sheet has to be filed and FSL report is; awaited.

¶36

Considering the said aspects, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the Petitioners.

¶37

Acco;'dinglv, the Criminal Petition is allou'ed and the petitioners are granted regular bail subject to the folloraing conditions:

¶38

i. Th: petitioners shall execute personal bond for a sum of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand onir,) r.t'ith tu,o sureties fol the like sum each to the satisfaction of the Additional .tudicial First Class Magistrate, Ramannapet.

¶39

ii. The petitioners shall appear before the Station House Officer, Choutuppal police Station, on every Sunday between 10.00 AM and S.OO pM, till completion of investigation and filing of charge sheet.

¶40

iii. The petitioners shall cooperate with the

¶41

Investigating Officer.

¶42

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand disposed

¶43

of.

¶44

st)/- \l \1,\.I1.1..\ .\S!rlSl'AYl RL I STIt,\

//TRUE COPYII

SECTION OFFICEII

To,

I . The V Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Bhongir, Nalgonda District.

¶49

The Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Ramannap6f, Nalgonda District.

¶50

The Superintendent, Nalgonda District Jail, Nalgonda.

¶51

The Station House Officer, Choutuppal Police Station, Nalgonda District.

¶52

Two Ccs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangan46t Hyderabad (OUT)

¶53

Two CCs to Sri M.A. Mujeeb, Advocate^(OPUC)

¶54

one Spare Copy

HIGH COURT

KL,J

DATE: t1-11-2020

OITDEII.

CRL.P. NOS. 4734 & 4788 0F 2020

¶60

BAIL

¶61

E
C \t
{
:).'f.
(
<br>tiu /ip* 11
l,l3,{e a
,ll
+
{,
i)
<br>

Dandugala Ramesh v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dandugala Ramesh v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nunavath Bhangya Vs The State of Telangana

Ragula Poshalu Vs The State of Telangana

Padiyala Pavan Sai Vs The state of Telangana

Dandugala Yadagiri Vs The State of Telangana

Basani Sagar Vs The State of Telangana

Verpula Nageswar Rao , Bixam Vs The State of Telangana