land, laid the roads, as per the layout and fixed the identification stones for the plots to facilitate different purchasers. Ultimately, it is enjoying the peaceful possession over the unsold plots i.e. plot Nos.6, 10, 15, 27, 70 and 76. However, as under the sale deed entered between the appellant-company and its purchasers of different plots, it is the duty of the company to develop the entire layout. Thus, the company started developing the layout. However, on 10.10.2017 around 11:00 A.M., the respondent Nos.1 to 17, along with their henchmen, tried to obstruct the development works being carried out by the appellant-company. Therefore, on 16.10.2017, the company lodged a complaint with the Station House Officer, P.S. Vanasthalipuram against the respondent Nos.1 to 17. However, despite having lodged the complaint against them, on 14.11.2017 at about 01:00 P.M., the respondent Nos.1 to 17 again interfered with the peaceful possession, and enjoyment of the property i.e. the entire layout plan. Again on 05.12.2017, the respondents interfered with the peaceful possession. Hence, the company filed a Civil Suit for seeking a permanent injunction against the respondent Nos.1 to 15. Along with the suit, the appellant-company also filed a temporary injunction application. However, by order dated 03.10.2017, the said temporary injunction application has been dismissed by the learned Judge. Hence, this appeal before this Court.
