The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
High Court for the State of Telangana
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
A.S.No.2114 of 2004
Date: 07.03.2019
Between:
Shaik Hussain Bin Abdul Khader Al Amodi
…Appellant
and
Ayesha Asma and others
…Respondents
Counsel for the appellant : Mr. Mohd Osman Shaheed
represented by Mr. M. Narasimha Rao
Counsel for the respondents: None present
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT : (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhan)
Mr. M. Narasimha Rao, the learned counsel representing
Mr. Mohd Osman Shaheed, the learned counsel for the appellant,
wishes to withdraw this appeal.
There shall be no order as to costs.
___________
(RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, J)
(T. AMARNATH GOUD, J)
07 th March, 2019
JSU
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
A.S.No.2114 of 2004
Date: 07.03.2019
JSU
Shaik Hussain Bin Abdul Khader Al Amodi
Ayesha Asma and others
Raghvendra Singh Chauhan
T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
