The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by Ayesha Asma and others for non-prosecution as the appellant's counsel did not appear on the scheduled date, following a prior order warning of dismissal.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
High Court for the State of Telangana
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
A.S.No.2367 of 2004
Date: 07.03.2019
Between:
Ayesha Asma and others.
…Appellants
and
Shaik Hussain Bin Abdul Khader Al Amodi
…Respondent
Counsel for the appellant : None present
Counsel for the respondents: None present
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT : (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhan)
By order dated 04.02.2019, this Court had made it abundantly clear that in case the learned counsel for the appellants does not appear on the next date, this case shall be dismissed for non-prosecution.
Today, the learned counsel for the appellants has not appeared before this Court.
Therefore, the appeal is hereby dismissed for non-
prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________
(RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, J)
(T. AMARNATH GOUD, J)
07 th March, 2019
JSU
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
A.S.No.2367 of 2004
Date: 07.03.2019
JSU
Ayesha Asma and others
Shaik Hussain Bin Abdul Khader Al Amodi
Raghvendra Singh Chauhan
T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
