The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous at the instance of the petitioner's counsel, consequently closing associated miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.38922 of 2013
ORDER (ORAL): (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice S.V. Bhatt)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the
cause in the writ petition is rendered infructuous.
Writ petition is dismissed accordingly.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, stand closed.
_________________________
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, CJ
S.V. BHATT, J
November 19, 2018
MRR
Petitioner
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
