The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the subject matter no longer required judicial intervention, pending miscellaneous petitions were closed, and the matter was disposed of by the Court.
Writ petition dismissed; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.15879 of 2017
ORDER (ORAL): (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice S.V. Bhatt)
Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that the
cause in the writ petition is rendered infructuous.
Writ petition is dismissed accordingly.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, stand closed.
_________________________
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, CJ
S.V. BHATT, J
November 19, 2018
MRR
Petitioners
Respondents
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
