The Chief Justice noted that counsel for the petitioners submitted the cause was rendered infructuous, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition and closure of any pending miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.37093 of 2016
ORDER (ORAL): (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice S.V. Bhatt)
Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that the
cause in the writ petition is rendered infructuous.
Writ petition is dismissed accordingly.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, stand closed.
_________________________
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, CJ
S.V. BHATT, J
November 19, 2018
MRR
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
