The bench dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by counsel with liberty to press the prayer later. The withdrawal was allowed in view of orders in a batch matter. No order as to costs.
Liberty sought not to press the writ prayer and to agigate later if the cause of action arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.18851 OF 2007
ORDER: (ORAL) (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice S.V.Bhatt)
The petitioners pray for the following relief:-
…this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue order or direction, especially in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the certificate of amendment in R.C.No.1555/2007-M.A.C.S dated 28.6.2007 issued by the 2nd respondent as contrary to law, illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and pass…”
The writ petition is listed along with W.P.No.36900 of 2016 and
batch. Mr.Posani Venkateswarlu made submissions in support of the writ prayer for considerable length of time and after arguing the matter for some time, and particularly taking note of the observations made by and orders passed by the Bench, Mr.Posani Venkateswarlu, for the present, seeks liberty not to press the present writ prayer and also to agitate as and when the cause of action arises. The statement is placed on record and accepted.
With the above observations, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. While dismissing the writ petition, we notice that the writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn in view of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.36900 of 2016 and batch from time to time. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, stand closed.
__________________________________ THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, CJ
____________ S.V.BHATT, J
20th November, 2018 Pnb/ Lrkm
Petitioners
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
