The petitioner challenged a bank notice demanding loan repayment. During hearing, the bank produced evidence of post-facto waiver and return of pledged security. The court held the petition infructuous as the cause didn't survive.
None granted. The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO WRIT PETITION No.13891 of 2009
ORDER:
The petitioner seeks Writ of Certiorari calling for records relating to the notice issued by the 1st respondent dated 13.06.2009 in respect of A/c.No.706047845 and quash the said notice.
Hence, the writ petition.
2
_________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
Dt: 04.10.2018 Murthy
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives adjudication after the respondent bank accepted the petitioner's claim and delivered pledged jewels.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to quashing of the recovery notice in view of post-facto waiver benefit.
Petitioner (Name not stated)
1st Respondent (Name not stated)
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
