M/S. Sri. Sir Arthur Cotton High School, Vijayawada. and 4 Oth Vs Secy., Labour and Employee Dept., Hyd and Ano

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO WRIT PETITION No.20099 of 2009

ORDER:

The petitioner seeks Writ of Mandamus declaring G.O.Rt.No.1887, Labour Employment, Training and Factories (IMS), dated 26.09.2008, published in Andhra Pradesh Gazette No.582, Part I, Extraordinary dated 14.10.2008, as Final Notification and the earlier G.O.Rt.No.2525, Labour Employment, Training and Factories Department, dated 13.11.2007 published in A.P. Gazette No.662, dated 23.11.2007, issued by first respondent, as arbitrary, illegal, mala fide, improper, void, unconstitutional and against the provisions of Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 and consequently direct respondents to desist from acting in pursuance of the said G.O.Rt.No.1887, dated 26.09.2008.

¶4

When the matter came up for hearing, both the learned counsel would submit that the subject matter in the instant writ petition is covered by the Common Order of a Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal Nos.200 of 2016 and Batch wherein, the orders dated 6.10.2015 in Writ Petition Nos.6363 of 2009 and Batch were challenged and the Division Bench, ultimately dismissed the Writ Appeals on 16.03.2016, confirming the orders of Learned Single Judge, who held that writ petitioner could not make out a case to assail the validity of Gazette Notification No.582 dated 14.10.2008 notifying the G.O.Rt.No. 1887 Labour, Employment Training and Factories (IMS), dated 26.9.2008. 3. Therefore, the instant writ petition is dismissed in terms of the Common Order in Writ Appeal Nos. 200 of 2016 and Batch, dated 16.3.2016. No costs.

¶5

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand

¶6

closed.

¶7

___________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J

¶8

Date: 03/10/2018 Slk

¶9

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO

¶10

WRIT PETITION No. 20099 of 2009

¶11

Date: 03/10/2018

¶12

slk

M/S. Sri. Sir Arthur Cotton High School, Vijayawada. and 4 Oth v. Secy., Labour and Employee Dept., Hyd and Ano

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Sri. Sir Arthur Cotton High School, Vijayawada. and 4 Oth v. Secy., Labour and Employee Dept., Hyd and Ano

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Reshma Khan Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh

M/s. Mahavir Pharmacy Vs The Union of India

Puvvala Kotaiah Vs The Government of India, Ministryof Home Affairs

Shaik Hussain, Vs The Additional Agent to the Government and Project Officer

Secy., St. Josephs Public School Hyd. Vs Union of India, Min. of Health and 2 Ors.

Shastry High School, Sec Vs Secy, Labour and Employment Dept, Hyd and Another