This order dismisses an old writ petition due to the petitioner's failure to file a representation and show interest in prosecuting the matter, resulting in non-prosecution.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
WRIT PETITION No.9846 of 2011
ORDER:
Notice served to petitioner and acknowledgement was filed by the Registry, but there is no representation for petitioner. It is an old matter of the year 2011. It appears the petitioner is not interested to prosecute
the matter.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
_________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J Dt: 04.10.2018 Murthy
Petitioner
U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
