A Writ Petition (No.23464 of 2012) challenging the validity of G.O.Rt.No.1887 dated 26.09.2008 was dismissed as the subject matter had been already covered by a Common Order of a Division Bench (Writ Appeal Nos.200 of 2016) dismissing similar appeals on 16.03.2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO WRIT PETITION No.23464 of 2012
ORDER:
The petitioner seeks Writ of Mandamus declaring G.O.Rt.No.1887, Labour Employment, Training and Factories (IMS) Department, dated 26.09.2008, as illegal, void, unconstitutional and against the provisions of Employment State Insurance Act, 1948 and consequently direct respondent No.2 to drop all further proceedings in pursuance of the Code No.52-00-034416-000-1303.
When the matter came up for hearing, both the learned counsel would submit that the subject matter in the instant writ petition is covered by the Common Order of a Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal Nos.200 of 2016 and Batch wherein, the orders dated 6.10.2015 in Writ Petition Nos.6363 of 2009 and Batch were challenged and the Division Bench, ultimately dismissed the Writ Appeals on 16.03.2016, confirming the orders of Learned Single Judge, who held that writ petitioner could not make out a case to assail the validity of Gazette Notification No.582 dated 14.10.2008 notifying the G.O.Rt.No. 1887 Labour, Employment Training and Factories (IMS), dated 26.9.2008.
Therefore, the instant writ petition is dismissed in terms of the Common Order in Writ Appeal Nos. 200 of 2016 and Batch, dated 16.3.2016. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
Date:3.10.2018 Slk
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
WRIT PETITION No.23464 of 2012
Date: 03/10/2018
slk
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed despite the subject matter being covered by a Common Order of a Division Bench dismissing similar Writ Appeals.
Whether G.O.Rt.No.1887 dated 26.09.2008 is illegal, void, unconstitutional under the Employment State Insurance Act, 1948.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Appeal Nos.200 of 2016Referred¶5
Writ Appeal Nos.200 of 2016 and Batch
Petitioner
Respondent No.2
U.Durga Prasad Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
