Dismissed

Younus, S/o. Akber, v. State of Telangana, rep. by its Secretary

Telangana HC20 Apr 2017WP/27356/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A common order dismissing writ petitions challenging the computation of boy-service for regularization eligibility. The court directed the university to recognize boy-service as eligibility service within two months.

What did the court decide?

Directing the respondents to consider the claims of the petitioners to regularize their services treating the entire service rendered by them including boy-service as eligibility service and grant con

Younus, S/o. Akber, Vs State of Telangana… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION NOs.41288 of 2014 & 27356 of 2015

¶3

Date: 20.04.2017

¶4

WP NO. 41288 of 2014:

¶5

Between:

¶6

B.Babaiah S/o Ramulu, Aged 41 years, occu: Casual Labour, O/o the Associate Dean College of Agriculture, Rajendernagar, Professor Jaya Shankar Telangana State Agricultural University, (formally part of Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University) and another.

¶7

…..Petitioners

¶8

and

¶9

State of Telangana, rep.by its Secretary, Agricultural and Co-operation (AGRI-III) Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.

¶10

…..Respondents

¶11

The Court made the following:

¶12

PNR,J W.P.No.41288 of 2014 & 27356 of 2015

¶13

¶14

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶15

WRIT PETITION NOs.41288 of 2014 & 27356 of 2015

¶16

COMMON ORDER:

¶17

In these two writ petitions, petitioners claim that they rendered service for more than five years by 25.11.1993 and eligible for regularization. However, their eligibility is not recognized on the ground that part of the service was rendered by them while they were minors, calling it as ‘Boy service’.

¶18

On the very same issue, consequent to the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.932 of 2014, the Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, issued orders in Memo No.17060/Lab/ A1/2016, dated 06.01.2017 holding that the ‘boy-service’ rendered by casual labour would be computed towards five years of eligibility service as on 25.11.1993 to consider their claims for regularization into the vacant posts.

¶19

In view of the said orders of University, writ petitions are disposed of, directing the respondents to consider the claims of the petitioners to regularize their services treating the entire service rendered by them including ‘boy-service’ as eligibility service of five years as on 25.11.1993 and grant consequential benefits flowing out of such consideration. Entire exercise shall be completed within two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶20

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in these writ petitions shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶21

___________________________ JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶22

Date: 20.04.2017 kkm

¶23

PNR,J W.P.No.41288 of 2014 & 27356 of 2015

¶24

¶25

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶26

WRIT PETITION NOs.41288 of 2014 & 27356 OF 2015

¶27

Date: 20.04.2017

¶28

kkm

Younus, S/o. Akber, v. State of Telangana, rep. by its Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Younus, S/o. Akber, v. State of Telangana, rep. by its Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri C. Pramod Kumar, Vs The Managing Director, a.P.Beverages Corporation Limited

Mohd. Moinuddin, Vs Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural

Apsrtc Sc/St Employees Welfare Association, Vs The A.P.S.R.T.C.

S. Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Shaik Shabar Hussain Vs The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal

Smt. B. Devi, Vs The State of Telangana