Petitioner's grievance was redressed after filing the writ petition. The court held the cause does not survive and closed the petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO. 9207 OF 2017
Between:
Mohd. Moinuddin S/o Late Mohd Abdullah
….Petitioner
A n d
Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad and one another
….Respondents
DATE OF ORDER: 19.04.2017
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO. 9207 OF 2017
ORDER:
Counsel for petitioner represents that after filing of the Writ Petition, the grievance of the petitioner was redressed.
In view of the above, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration and accordingly, the Writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
P. NAVEEN RAO, J Date: 19.04.2017 KA
Mohd. Moinuddin
Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
