Disposed

Smt. B. Devi, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC20 Apr 2017WP/13975/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge (Writ Bench) directed the State of Telangana to examine the petitioners' claim for regularization benefits enjoyed by junior officers and inform them of the action within two months, without determining merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 2nd respondent to examine the petitioners' claim, take appropriate action, and inform them within two months. No order as to costs.

Smt. B. Devi, Vs The State of Telangana — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.13975 OF 2017

¶3

Dated:20.04.2017

¶4

Between:

¶5

Smt. B. Devi, D/o. Mangya, Caste STc, Aged 31 years, Present working as English Contract Residential Teacher (CRT) in K.G.B.V. Tekupalli, Bhadrachalam, R/o.H.No.17-1-6/A, Bhagavandas Colony, Bhadrachalam, Badradri Kothagudem District and others .. Petitioners And The State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents

¶6

The Court made the following:

¶7

¶8

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.13975 OF 2017

¶9

ORDER:

¶10

Petitioner claims that pursuant to recruitment notification of the year 2010, they were selected and appointed as Hostel Welfare Officers Grade – II vide orders dated 18.08.2010. Later, petitioners 1 and 3 were appointed as English Contract Residential Teachers and 2^nd petitioner was appointed as Contract Hostel Welfare Officer Grade – II.

¶11

Grievance of the petitioners necessitating institution of this Writ Petition is, services of about 20 Contract Hostel Welfare Officers Grade – II were regularized vide G.O.Ms.No.57, dated 19.12.2016, whereas the said benefit is not extended to them. According to petitioners, persons in whose favour said orders were passed are juniors to them. Ventilating their grievance and soliciting conferment of same benefit, petitioners claim to have submitted representation on 02.03.2017 to the Commissioner of Tribal Welfare, Government of Telangana, Hyderabad, the 2^nd respondent.

¶12

In view of the above facts, without entering into the merits of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 2^nd respondent to examine the claim of the petitioners as reflected in their representation, dated 02.03.2017, and take appropriate further course of action as warranted by law and petitioners may be informed of the said action within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶13

¶14

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶15

P. NAVEEN RAO, J Date:20.04.2017 KH

Smt. B. Devi, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. B. Devi, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri C. Pramod Kumar, Vs The Managing Director, a.P.Beverages Corporation Limited

Mohd. Moinuddin, Vs Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural

Apsrtc Sc/St Employees Welfare Association, Vs The A.P.S.R.T.C.

S. Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Shaik Shabar Hussain Vs The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal

Younus, S/o. Akber, Vs State of Telangana, rep. by its Secretary