Petition challenging arrests dismissed as infructuous since arrested persons were released by the Mandal Executive Magistrate on personal bonds within the same day.
writ petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions, if any, dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 6885 of 2016
Date: 03.03.2016
Between:
Shanmugam
… Petitioner
And State of A.P., rep., by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad & others. … Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 6885 of 2016
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Sri C.S. Surya Prakash, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 5, submits that the persons named in the prayer clause were arrested in connection with Crime No.78 of 2016 on 15.02.2016 by Satyanarayanapuram Police Station and they were produced before Mandal Executive Magistrate, Vijayawada, on the same day and as per his instructions, they were released on execution of personal bonds by the said Magistrate.
In view of this, Sri Akurathi Ramakrishna, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the writ petition may be disposed of as infructuous.
Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed.
DILIP B.BHOSALE, ACJ
P. NAVEEN RAO, J
Date: 03.03.2016
Es
Shanmugam
State of A.P.
DILIP B BHOSALE
NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
