Petitioner's writ petition was disposed of as not pressed after the petitioner instructed the counsel not to proceed following the involvement of another woman in his company.
Writ petition disposed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 5721 of 2016
Date: 02.03.2016
Between:
Shake Nazeer … Petitioner And The State of A.P., rep., by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad & others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 5721 of 2016
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
Sri Challa Srinivasa Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that after filing of the writ petition, Miss. Leena has joined the company of the petitioner and, therefore, he has instructions not to press the writ petition.
Writ petition is disposed of as not pressed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
DILIP B.BHOSALE, ACJ
__________________
P. NAVEEN
RAO, J
Date: 02.03.2016 Es
Shake Nazeer
The State of A.P.
DILIP B. BHOSALE
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
