Disposed

Ankal Reddy Memorial Hall, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Telangana HC2 Mar 2016WP/6559/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Hyderabad disposed of Writ Petition No. 6559 of 2016 filed by Ankal Reddy Memorial Hall regarding property tax. Upon counsel submitting that the petitioner would file a statutory revision, the court said nothing further survived in the writ and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file revision under Rule 12 of the Taxation and Finance Rules.

Ankal Reddy Memorial Hall, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary — Telangana HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶4

WRIT PETITION No.6559 OF 2016

¶5

DATED: 02.03.2016

¶6

Between: Ankal Reddy Memorial Hall … Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh and another

¶7

… Respondents

¶8

THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

¶9

WRIT PETITION No.6559 of 2016

¶10

PC: (per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

There is no dispute that a revision lies under Rule 12 of the Taxation and Finance Rules framed under Section 130 of the Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, against the demand of property tax, as made in the present writ petition.

¶13

In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is prepared to file revision within a period of two weeks from today.

¶14

Mr. Md. Saleem, learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that if the petitioner files revision as aforementioned within a period of two weeks from today, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the same on merits in accordance with law and without entering into an issue of limitation. He further submits that the revision will be considered and decided without demanding the tax as per the impugned notice. His statement is recorded and accepted. In view thereof, nothing further survives in the writ

¶15

petition.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file revision under Rule 12 of the Taxation and Finance Rules. Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

¶17

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶18

________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ

¶19

2^nd MARCH, 2016. _________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J kvni

Ankal Reddy Memorial Hall, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankal Reddy Memorial Hall, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. Unitgrasilene Division Vs The Union of India, Represented by its Secretary

Toddy Tappers Co-operative Society-Mahabubnagar Vs The State of Telangna, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Koya Nagamani Vs The State of Telangana represented by Principal

Sadhu Rama Rao, Vs The Government of A.P.

Shake Nazeer Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Sadhu Damayanthi, Vs The Govt. of a.P., rep.by its Secretary, Co-op. Dept.